Review: "King Lear"

October 22, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Even if you only have a passing knowledge of Shakespeare's "King Lear," you probably recall that the title monarch had three daughters. Two were willing to butter him up for a bigger share of his kingdom. The other, who loved him best, refused to gush and found herself banish by her father's wrath.

Well, when the total company of Actors from the London Stage walks out on stage, there are only two women in the cast. The numbers don't seem to work out.

But they do. Kind of. One actress is playing both Goneril and Codelia. And one of the actors is playing both Edgar and his half-brother Edmund. And the gentleman playing King Lear is also covering both of his sons-in-law.

And while this may seem very confusing, it honestly isn't. In fact, the production presented Wednesday evening at Butler University by this touring group (repeated Thursday at 7:30), offered the most understandable reading of the show I've seen.

Terence Wilton feels young as Lear--he might have hung onto the crown for another twenty years--but his slip into madness is compelling and believable. Richard Neale plays much of evil Edmund in the shout range, but is a strong presence throughout. Dale Rapley has a tour-de-force conversation with himself as Gloucester and Kent (although I wasn't as ultimately moved by either as I should be). Caroline Devlin makes a strong Regan and an effective Fool (although the part would seem more suited to doubling with Cordelia). And Rina Mahony nails Goneril's viciousness condescension.

No, it didn't reach the heights of other Lears. Without sets, cast scale or much in the way of costuming, the collapsing of a kingdom and its importance beyong the family is largely lost.  And the doubling, tripling, and more of characters takes away some of the sense of death's permanence and the frailty of the human body that permeates the play. But in the hands of this sharp, nimble and well-voiced company, "King Lear" remains a remarkable evening of theater.

FYI: The American home for Actors From the London Stage is Notre Dame University, which makes them kind-of a home-state theater.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Enjoyable evening
    I will admit that I had some trepidation about a nearly 3 hour (it's the entire text - no cuts), 5-actor LEAR. However, I found myself very satisfied and without any instance of boredom or mental exhaustion that I had kind of expected... I felt this interesting presentation brought the text to life in a way I hadn't seen before. Having never seen LEAR on stage, I didn't feel cheated by the lack of scenery, lighting, etc... All in all, a decent evening of classic theatre!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT