Review: "King Lear"

October 22, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Even if you only have a passing knowledge of Shakespeare's "King Lear," you probably recall that the title monarch had three daughters. Two were willing to butter him up for a bigger share of his kingdom. The other, who loved him best, refused to gush and found herself banish by her father's wrath.

Well, when the total company of Actors from the London Stage walks out on stage, there are only two women in the cast. The numbers don't seem to work out.

But they do. Kind of. One actress is playing both Goneril and Codelia. And one of the actors is playing both Edgar and his half-brother Edmund. And the gentleman playing King Lear is also covering both of his sons-in-law.

And while this may seem very confusing, it honestly isn't. In fact, the production presented Wednesday evening at Butler University by this touring group (repeated Thursday at 7:30), offered the most understandable reading of the show I've seen.

Terence Wilton feels young as Lear--he might have hung onto the crown for another twenty years--but his slip into madness is compelling and believable. Richard Neale plays much of evil Edmund in the shout range, but is a strong presence throughout. Dale Rapley has a tour-de-force conversation with himself as Gloucester and Kent (although I wasn't as ultimately moved by either as I should be). Caroline Devlin makes a strong Regan and an effective Fool (although the part would seem more suited to doubling with Cordelia). And Rina Mahony nails Goneril's viciousness condescension.

No, it didn't reach the heights of other Lears. Without sets, cast scale or much in the way of costuming, the collapsing of a kingdom and its importance beyong the family is largely lost.  And the doubling, tripling, and more of characters takes away some of the sense of death's permanence and the frailty of the human body that permeates the play. But in the hands of this sharp, nimble and well-voiced company, "King Lear" remains a remarkable evening of theater.

FYI: The American home for Actors From the London Stage is Notre Dame University, which makes them kind-of a home-state theater.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Enjoyable evening
    I will admit that I had some trepidation about a nearly 3 hour (it's the entire text - no cuts), 5-actor LEAR. However, I found myself very satisfied and without any instance of boredom or mental exhaustion that I had kind of expected... I felt this interesting presentation brought the text to life in a way I hadn't seen before. Having never seen LEAR on stage, I didn't feel cheated by the lack of scenery, lighting, etc... All in all, a decent evening of classic theatre!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT