Review: "Mamma Mia!"

October 27, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Broadway in Indianapolis subscription season gets off to a late start this year (the first presentation is the late December offering of "The Color Purple"). But some returnees have been added to the schedule as "specials," with the first stopping by last weekend.

Those, like me, who saw and enjoyed "Mamma Mia!" on previous visits, got what they paid for when the touring company came through Oct. 23-25. Anchored by a heartfelt Sophie (Liana Hunt) and a trio of amiable, charming potential papas (Michael Aaron Lindner, Martin Kildare, and John Hemphill), it moved briskly through the now-familiar story of a young about-to-be-married woman trying to figure out who her real father is before the walk down the aisle.

That the story seems more about her than about her mother, Donna (Michelle Dawson), speaks to a shift that I've noticed since first seeing the pre-Broadway run in Chicago.

Back then, the show was grounded in the earthy, road-hardened performance of Louise Pitre in the part. You sensed the dirt under her fingernails from managing her Greek taverna. And when her long-ditched romantic ideas were rekindled, it meant something. The current Donna seems like yet another soap opera stunner (with, I must say, some odd, unpleasant inflections in her singing) who melts far too quickly. And, on opening night, her gal pals were played by understudies far too young for the roles--although Jane Cooke made a game go of it as Rosie.

Still, the under appreciated, savvy book by Catherine Johnson and the undeniably infectious music helped overcome the show's cracks. Rather than burn out on the show, I'm now anxious to see what happens when regional theater rights are released and the like of Beef & Boards and Indianapolis Civic Theatre take a shot at it.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. First, let me say that I love the idea of communities being self-sufficient and people in the community not needing cars, living, working and shopping all in their neighborhood. To sum it up; I love good urban planning and hate urban sprawl. However, there are two reasons that I am against this development. First, this building doesn't fit. Density can occur in Ripple by building up top the street and better use of land. The scale of this project should be downtown. Secondly, I would be willing to bet that if a whole foods in Ripple is built, the Nora store would be closed. Here's my reasoning. The Nora Whole Foods expansion plans have been put on hold. I'm guessing they are waiting to see what happens with the Ripple proposal. Communities next to each other should work together to end sprawl and not work against each other and take other neighbors assets. Develop something both communities can be proud of and will attract more development and density. There's my soap box for the day.

  2. My apologies, Lou - it was the Indy Star that printed cost for entertaining "celebrities" during Indy 500. Sorry for confusing the always timely IBJ with Indy's Gannett reprint news source.

  3. That's fine if you want a grocery store that has festivals and live music. I guess with the prices they charge, they can afford to host such activities. As for me, I choose to spend my money more wisely and if I want to go to a festival or a concert, I will pay for that separately - not through my grocery bill.

  4. TIF is not just to attract development but to attract a higher use for that development. Carmel wisely is using TIF for numerous public parking garages. Asphalt seas of parking pay little taxes and bring even less value to a commercial area. Also density is what is going to save Indy and Broad Ripple. The days of trying to compete with burbs are long gone.

  5. The Prestige was an awesome movie.

ADVERTISEMENT