'Kirkus' killed

December 11, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Yesterday it was announced that "Kirkus Reviews" will cease publication.

It's likely that you've never heard of that publication, unless you are a librarian, a writer, or otherwise in the book business, but "Kirkus" is one of the few places where books are regularly reviewed. Here's a link to a story on its departure can be found here, in School Library Journal (thanks for the link, Hope).

Known for its bluntness (It called my first published novel "A harebrained tale not even a desperate housewife could love"--ah well), "Kirkus" was a bi-weekly must-read for retail book purchasers and librarians.

How does this impact you? Well, even avid readers may not realize it, but if a book isn't written by Stephen King or John Grisham, it is unlikely to be reviewed much at all. Early comments in "Kirkus Reviews" or "Publishers Weekly" --the two publications known for voluminous reviews -- can help create the snowball effect that causes books by unknown authors to come out of nowhere and catch fire (to mix my heat metaphors).

It will be missed.

My questions to you: How did you hear about the last few books you've read? Have reviews ever convinced you to give a book a shot?

Your thoughts?

  • Powells.com
    Powells.com provides for free an email newsletter called "The Daily Dose" which gives reviews from both popular and little known authors across all genres. I have found some wonderful titles in the two+ years that I've been a subscriber.
  • Amazon reviews
    Amazon.com is great for individual readers. It provides reviews for the books it carries, makes digital recommendations and posts lists of recommendations. You can search by author and subject and title and whatever. With a little seasoning, you can differentiate reviews by serious readers from reviews by goofballs.
  • Jaclyn
    I hear about most of the books I read through recommendations from other people. I've found some great reads this way and have rarely been disappointed. A review might impact my choice in books, but they don't matter to me nearly as much getting feedback from someone I personally know and trust.
  • Beware of shills. . .Â¥
    I no longer trust publisher's reviews or personal reviews on Amazon. Many times, after reading readers' reviews, I'd read the book -- only to be greatly disappointed. I have come to believe that many times these reviews are written by publisher's shills, trying to increase sales.

    Publisher's reviews are, by their very nature, suspect. But, reviews presented by people who masquerade as non-afilliated readers, is certainly beyond the pale.
    • Best Source for Reviews
      I love Kirkus. I have relied on their judgement to select the fiction and non-fiction books that I read. PW will have to do but Kirkus had the strongest grasp of what would be a good read and the most informative non-fiction reviews that would refer you to a better book on the topic than the one being reviewed. I will miss Kirkus very much.
    • I will miss Kirkus
      I will miss Kirkus, too. I don't know of any good professional librarian or bookseller that relied solely on Kirkus, but when combined with Publisher's Weekly, Booklist, and Library Journal, (and Horn Book, VOYA, School Library Journal, and BCCB for children's and teen books) one could get a pretty good sense of a book's appropriateness for one's own collection and customer base. There is never enough money or space to buy every book published.

      Kirkus reviewers often said, in so many words, "It's flawed," and I would often say in response, "Yeah, but it sounds like it would be fun to read so I'm buying it anyway." BUT the Kirkus review helped me to think more deeply about what makes books effective or not on a level beyond fun.

      Aaggh, I have more to say on this topic but it has been a long weekend and I am beat.

      Thanks for bringing this up for discussion on your blog, Lou. By the way, I hope I always get to read your voice in the mix of arts reviewers.

      And by the way #2, what was the title of your first, "harebrained" tale?

      Hope Baugh
      Indy Theatre Habit
    • Amazon reviews
      --you can't trust them because the authors get their friends to write great reviews about their books.

    Post a comment to this blog

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.