Missing ATI's "Frog and Toad"

December 22, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In 2008 and 2009, a highlight of the holiday season for me was a visit with Actors Theatre of Indiana's "A Year with Frog and Toad." Magically innocent and very knowing at the same time, the musical turned me almost evangelical as I praised it to friends, family and readers. I'm sure I wasn't alone in looking forward to revisiting the swamp this month.

Unfortunately, though, Frog and his pal Toad weren't anywhere to be found.

What happened?

According to ATI's Judy Fitzgerald, her company wanted to restage the show this month. However, a touring production of the show is making a brief stop at Clowes Hall--in March--and the rights were withheld.

"Hard to believe because they are only doing two matinee shows," said Fitzgerald. And I agree. What kind of Scrooge would refuse to allow a holiday tradition in favor of a few matinee shows months later--especially a kid-appealing show so vital to one of Indy's few fully professional companies?

"We were very disappointed," added Fitzgerald, "but plan on bringing the production back next Christmas."

Bravo to ATI. Boo to the "Frog and Toad" bean counting meanies. In the meantime, ATI will be launching its 2010 season with a March production of "Nunsense" with more shows to be announced.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Nothing new
    This type of behavior from licensing houses is hardly anything new. If there is another production (professional especially) within a certain set number of miles, the rights will be "restricted." This might not be a bad thing for ATI. With a little more pre-planning, they could have scheduled yet another holiday tradition that could be rotated with dear ol' FROG & TOAD.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT