'Avatar,' 'Nine,' and more

December 24, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
I spent  Wednesday evening at the Regal Galaxy theater checking out two of the big holiday movies. Now I feel like I've seen enough of a critical mass to comment.
 
Here goes, in order of my enthusiasm.

"Princess and the Frog." Disney gets refocused on what it does best in this fun musical that's much more than an equally opportunity gimmick. While it doesn't have breakout sequences like "Beauty and the Beast" and "The Little Mermaid," it does have an interesting heroine, some wonderful supporting characters, and a genuinely tear-inducing ending. It's great to see that the mouse factory isn't relying entirely on the Pixar side of the business. Speaking of Pixar, it has been a terrific year for family films. When the latest Pixar offering, "Up," isn't a lock for Best Animated Film, that's a good sign. I'd argue that "Princess and the Frog," "Up," "Where the Wild Things Are," "Ponyo" and especially "The Fantastic Mr. Fox" all are worthy of spots on the newly expanded to 10 Academy Awards Best Picture nominations list.

"Sherlock Holmes." The makers of the latest Sir. Arthur Conan Doyle-inspired flick have turned the brainy hero into a two-fisted action hero. And that's not a bad thing, especially when he's played by the endlessly charming and watchable Robert Downey Jr. (who deserves a spot as one of Hollywood's finest, most consistant actors) and sidekicked with Jude Law as Dr. Watson. The plot isn't one for the ages--it seems to come from a mixture of equal parts "National Treasure" and Indiana Jones--and the female lead isn't as effectively written, director or acted as the lead boys, but that doesn't get in the way of the fun. Lots of violent action keeps this from being recommended for younger kids, but teens and up should have a blast. Even the Sherlock Holmes club members behind me at the screening (including my librarian) gave it a thumbs up.

 
"Up in the Air." My colleagues at the Indiana Film Journalists Association voted this one best film of the year. I wouldn't go that far, primarily because the device that gets the plot in motion is very difficult to buy and the ensuing action is fairly predictable. But that doesn't make the grown-up journey worth taking and the details sharp. George Clooney is fine but the breakout performance belongs to Vera Farmiga. 
 
"Invictus." Even if you don't leave understanding rugby--and even if the screenplay tends to speech-ify a few times too many--Clint Eastwood's sports/history/politics film is well worth the time. Morgan Freeman is just right as Nelson Mandela. Matt Damon is remarkably on-the-money as South Africa's rugby team leader. And the fairly anonymous supporting cast strikes just the right tone.

 

"It's Complicated." This comedy for grown-ups could have easily tipped too far into farce, but it's restraint makes it all the more effective. Alec Baldwin and Meryl Streep will get most of the attention. But John Krasinski, as Streep's soon-to-be son-in-law, has a lot to do with the film's appeal. And it's good to see a film where the implications of actions are actually considered.
 
"Avatar." James Cameron's science fiction epic will impress those who like to watch movies and say "how did they do that?" But for me it felt more like a 3D remake of "Ferngully" with elements of Disney's "Pocanontas" sprinkled in. Over-cluttered, video-game style action sequences, 1-D characters, and an overall lack of awe-inducing moments keep me from recommending it to those who aren't predisposed. Side note: If you have any respect for the military, "Avatar" is likely to turn your stomach in its treatment of soldiers. Haven't we matured to a point where we can disapprove of a war (the parallels to today are heavy-handed) without being prodded to cheer the violent deaths of soldiers?

"Nine." The magic that Rob Marshall brought to the film version of "Chicago" is nowhere to be found in his muddy adaption of the musical "Nine." I didn't see the show on stage, but I know that it's central gimmick was that blocked film director Guido Contini was the only man in the show. The rest of the cast of characters was comprised of the women in his life, including his mother, his wife, his mistress and his muse. In opening up the film, Marshall loses that focus. And the Maury Yeston songs--the few that weren't cut--don't translate well into close-ups. The result is an unpleasant, unfocused, dull film that doesn't help us understand or even care about the problems of this weasel. Daniel Day-Lewis seems to be working hard, but to little effect. And the only stand-outs among the women are Marion Cotillard as the wronged wife and Stacy "Fergie" Ferguson, who gives her song--and the movie--much needed uumph.

Your thoughts?

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Invictus
    Iwas in So Africa in 08, and locals still speak of "the game" as the great unifying moment among the races, because Mandela invested it with that meaning.
    namaste
  • Holiday Movies
    Thanks for the panorama, Lou. I'll check back in Tuesday. By then, I'll have seen three or more of these.
  • some...
    9 was pretty good. UP - I liked and it has it's sad moments but overall a quality movie. Avatar - saw in 2d, would be better in real-D but great storyline (imo). Where The Wild Things Are - Wonderful movie for any age. "It's Complicated" - funny movie for the older crowd - saw it with aunt and two cousins and it was worth it. And I want to see that Sherlock Homes movie.

    Not expecting the Sherlock Homes to be as good as the book, but what book-to-movie is?

    Movies which I will buy (or have bought) on DVD from this year: UP, Where The Wild Things Are, and Sherlock Homes (if it is good enough).

    Where The Wild Things Are is a book I grew up reading and the movie adds some heart to the book without destroying a part of my childhood. Though the Director took it into his direction, it had the core values necessary to be the only book-to-movie I can honestly say holds up.
  • Nine
    I loved Nine and it was very close to the broadway show. Too bad you didn't see it or listen to the soundtrack. It is a musical and you have to love musicals to love this great movie. To me Guido was a minor character compared to the strong, amazing women in the show!
  • Nine
    David,
    I'm glad you enjoyed "Nine." From all reports, though, it's very different from the show--including losing about half of the score and key transitional moments in the second half.
    While loving musicals may be a prerequisite to loving "Nine" (for the record, I'm not convinced that's the case), it certainly isn't a guarantee. You'll find few who love musicals more than I do, but the film left me cold.
    Thanks for reading and commenting,
    Lou
  • Avatar
    i personally found avatar to be a great movie when looked at on an intellectual level, the idea of balance and those who seek to destroy it for their own personal gain should be looked upon as a lesson, i dont know if you realize it but humankind has always been destructive to eachother and this movie restates it all well, i dont look at the soldiers in the movie as anything admirable, they were working for a corporation doing something which was purely destructive with no regard for who they were killing, the ore which the corporation was after was not described as a nessesity to survive but something that shareholders in the corporation were after and yet still they tried to wipe out an entire population. this movie should make people think about what is and isnt nessecary as well as good people winning out over those who would seek to destroy all they have.

    overall avatar was entirely enjoyable and i would recommend it to anyone and cannot see where you are coming from at all with your review

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT