Review: DK's "World Music Carnaval"

January 14, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

For its Jan. 7-10 program at the Indiana Repertory Theatre, Dance Kaleidoscope revisited 2000's "Food of Love" and 1999's "Play Mas'."

The first, originally performed at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival during a residency there, took inspiration from "Twelfth Night" and, it seemed, from children's games. Robes and ritual movement at the top of the show suggested a religious rite that soon gave way to games, partnerships, and even some friendly competition.

Fueled by world music, the pieces had energy more than content as connective tissue. In one movement, soloists followed their performances by picking their successors in the circle. In another, male dancers each showed their stuff and then high-fived to transition to the next, as if they were part of a cheerleading squad's half-time show. An effective if not particularly memorable curtain-raiser, "Food for Love" did make me wish I had seen DK in its Oregon Shakespeare Festival context...and hope that such outdoor "green shows" find a way into other events here. Perhaps the in-the-works Regional Performing Arts Center will include such appetizers during its first and future summer seasons. Here's hoping.

After intermission, the company returned for "Play Mas'." Much has been made about third-season DKer Brittany Edwards and how the piece had been retailored (and the lead given a sex change) to accommodate her talents. As in other DK appearances, she showed herself to be a dancer whose skills match her striking, star-quality appearance and choreographer David Hochoy worked her into the show in a variety of creative contexts.

The Carnaval atmosphere of the entire piece, though, felt less authentic than touristy. The rest of the company seemed like in-for-the-weekend vacationers instead of celebratory locals. (Then again, if you put this appealing crew in a beach house, that would be a "Jersey Shore" I would watch.) Elsewhere, a would-be fun -- and slightly erotic -- devil sequence was marred by flimsy pitchforks. George Salinas again proved a fun, comic dancer in a "gin and coconut water" drunk bit. And it all ended in an audience-participation parade that, at the Thursday performance, was fairly joyous and not nearly as awkward as such things can be.

Your thoughts? 

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Parade?! and thanks
    An audience participation parade at a dance performance? That sounds intriguing!

    Thanks for writing about this show, Lou, and for writing about the New Year's Day New Beginnings Cabaret in your weekly review column. I was sad to have missed both of them; I am glad I could at least read a little about them.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT