You-review-it Monday

January 18, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For me, the weekend included a screening of Robert Altman's "Nashville" at the Indianapolis Museum of Art. It's a film that shakes me up in all kinds of ways every time I see it--the kind of film that makes it difficult, for a while, to watch other films because none feel anywhere near as rich and human.

Prior to the screening, I discovered that Altman's later film "Buffalo Bill and the Indians or Sitting Bull's History Lesson" was an On Demand offering on my cable system. (I like the serendipity of the on-demand system. Why only watch movies we planned to watch?) "Buffalo Bill," which uses a lot of the same techniques used in "Nashville," is a more obvious film thematically. But it was much more effective--and funnier--than I remembered from seeing it 25 years ago. Paul Newman, Harvey Kietel, Geraldine Chaplin and many others are terrific in it. Although it bombed at the box office (as many Altman films did), it's not an artistic dud like his "Quintet" or "Health." I'll file it in the interesting not-quite-there's, along with "Popeye," "A Wedding," and "Brewster McCloud."

Of course, it's no "Nashville," which was once-again great on the big screen. This is one film that can't be contained in a TV set.

Thanks to WFYI's Matthew Socey and actors Matthew Roland, and Karen Irwin for helping me introduce it in Altman style.

I also caught the Phoenix Theatre's production of "The Housewives of Mannheim," which I'll be writing about soon either here or in the print IBJ.

Your thoughts? What did you see, hear or do this weekend?


  • Love Letters...lovely
    My wife and I were able to score tickets for the final performance of LOVE LETTERS at the IRT. It was a beautiful and touching production. The set was perfect, the direction superb and the performances were lovely. If you missed this one, you missed a lot!

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.