Indianapolis (Museum of Art) vs. New Orleans (Museum of Art)

January 27, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One of the more entertaining sideline dramas leading up to the Saints/Colts Super Bowl battle has been the playful but heated arrangement of a bet between the New Orleans Museum of Art and the Indianapolis Museum of Art.

The kick off came when IMA's Max Anderson offered to lend a painting by Ingrid Calame in the unlikely event that that Saints emerged victorious. NOMA smack-talked back, calling the Calame "an insignificant" work and proposing to up the ante with a Renoir.

The back-and-forth is well chronicled here.

End result?

If Manning and company win, the IMA gets Claude Lorrain's Ideal View of Tivoli, 1644.

If the Saints pull it off, the IMA has to send south Joseph Turner, The Fifth Plague of Egypt, 1800.

Now that's getting into the competitive spirit.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Sipperbowl
    For more fun Mass Ave Wine Shop is hosting Sipperbowl 2010: Indy Wines vs New Orleans Wines 1/31 at 1pm
  • ART BET
    I think this is pretty clever on the museum director's part. This is an extremely good way to raise the profiles of both museums on the national level and increase museum attendance in the case of the winner. BTW, Indianapolis has a much better art museum than New Orleans.
  • Awesome
    I am very excited about the opportunity to see the Claude Lorrain's Ideal View of Tivoli, 1644 and the Joseph Turner, The Fifth Plague of Egypt, 1800 hanging side by side at the IMA. In fact, when it happens, ( and it will happen) I will make a personal contribution to the IMA in the name of NOMA. Max really raised the bar on this one. It is too bad that the the fragile condition of New Orleans' Portrait of Marie Antoinette prohibits it from traveling. Max's offer to obtain the Marie Antoinette as a loan really shut down NOMA and made me laugh out loud on that one. GO Colts and GO IMA!

  • I'll see your Claude and raise you a Turner!
    Very clever banter indeed! Go COLTS + IMA!
  • Art Bet
    What a terrific way to raise awareness for the Arts & Culture Champions in each City - would it be great if it's a trend instead of food being wagered
  • A Stickler for Grammar
    Loan is a noun. Lend is a verb. Max Anderson offered to lend a painting...
  • Love, Art
    This is representational of why I love art, artists, other people who like art and artists, and all the people and institutions making it possible for me to like and be exposed to art and artists.
  • thanks
    Thank for the correction, Editor. It has been changed.

    See, IBJ A&E has the smartest blog responders in the city.
  • :-)
    We are so lucky to have Max Anderson at the IMA!
  • The museum itself as a work of art
    As a former resident of NOLA (pre-hurricane) and now a resident of Indy, I have seen both museuems. Although I love NOLA, the IMA wins hands down as the most creative space between the two. NOMA is more of a traditional museum whereas the IMA actually uses the museum space itself as a work of art. Now, who do I root for in the Superbowl............
  • A Perfect Combination
    What a great way for Indy's emerging status as a world class arts destination to compliment our established reputation as a great sports town. Rather than taking the, all to frequent, stance of choosing not to intermingle "low-brow sports" with "high-brow art", Max has found a creative and engaging way to marry the two. Bravo!
  • Now that is..
    Now that is something I can hope for (outside the Colts winning). This is a type of bet that brings attention to the Cultural side of a city. I wish we saw bets like this more often.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT