Few surprises in Oscar nominations

February 2, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Just as movie trailers tend to give away so much that the films themselves can sometimes seem redundant, all of the lead-up blather can make the announcement of the Oscar nominees an anticlimax.

Just a few minutes ago, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences announced its nominees for this year and only a small handful of choices are likely to raise an eyebrow. Interesting that Matt Damon scored for Supporting Actor in "Invictus." And that Maggie (driving spell check crazy) Gyllenhaal made it for "Crazy Heart." And a shame that "(500) Days of Summer" was roundly ignored.

Doubling the number of Best Picture nominations made that category open to such films as "District 9" and "A Serious Man" that otherwise would have been ignored. Unfortunately, the Academy only made room for one animated film, taking "Up" but leaving out the wonderful "Fantastic Mr. Fox." And where the heck is "Where the Wild Things Are"? That remarkable film scored exactly zero nominations--not even one for adapted screenplay.

Deeper into the category list, it's no surprise that "The Weary Kind" was nominated for Best Song (Let's see them turn that into a big production number). It's up against two Randy Newman "Princess and the Frog" tunes, one from "Nine," and something that doesn't stand a chance from a film called "Paris 36."

I'm always hoping to see films that were screened at the Heartland Film Festival or Indianapolis International Film Festival show up in the documentary, short film, or other categories. This year (and this is a correction from an earlier draft of this post), Heartlanders can cheer on "Kavi," while IIFF-ites can root for "Miracle Fish." Alas, no nom for Hal Holbrook, who gave what I think is the performance of the year in "That Evening Sun," which screened at Heartland.

In all, it looks like a year I'll be rooting against some films (""Avatar" and "Inglourious Basterds") rather than for others.

Then again, I still have to see "District 9," "An Education," "Precious," and "A Serious Man," so maybe there's hope.

Your thoughts?


  • Goodnight "Moon"
    I must admit I was a bit disappointed to see that Sam Rockwell had been ignored for a Best Actor nomination for his role in "Moon." His performance was transcedent. I applaud the noms "The Hurt Locker" received - and will be glued to the tube to watch the ceremony.
  • Seven to see
    Looks like I'll be spending some time in the dark before March 7th. The 10 Best Picture nominees are killing me - especially considering that I'm going to have to see District 9. Of the ones I've seen (which do not include Avatar, An Education and A Serious Man), I have to say I'm not bubbling over with enthusiasm for any above the others. Lots of good movies; no great stand outs. Glad to see Maggie Gyllenhaal get nominated. Looking forward to the arrival of The Last Station. Ahhh...I love Oscar season!
  • An Education
    An Education was a very good movie. Every year it seems the same people and movies get a certain "buzz," and that determines the trajectory the awards will take. The Oscars have never been especially meaningful or fair, but at least they used to be fun and capable of surprises.
  • Happy Surprises
    This year had some surprises, but most of them were actually good ones. Yes we had the insanely flawed Blind Side up for Best Picture, but we also had An Education and A Serious Man up for the same honor. Those are two movies that I really adored and hopefully more people will see them now.

    Ultimately, the coolest nomination was In the Loop actually received a nomination for Best Adapted Screenplay. This was easily my favorite comedy of the year and almost no one saw it.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  2. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

  3. Good try, Mr. Irwin, but I think we all know the primary motivation for pursuing legal action against the BMV is the HUGE FEES you and your firm expect to receive from the same people you claim to be helping ~ taxpayers! Almost all class action lawsuits end up with the victim receiving a pittance and the lawyers receiving a windfall.

  4. Fix the home life. We're not paying for your child to color, learn letters, numbers and possible self control. YOU raise your children...figure it out! We did. Then they'll do fine in elementary school. Weed out the idiots in public schools, send them well behaved kids (no one expects perfection) and watch what happens! Oh, and pray. A mom.

  5. To clarify, the system Cincinnati building is just a streetcar line which is the cheapest option for rail when you consider light rail (Denver, Portland, and Seattle.) The system (streetcar) that Cincy is building is for a downtown, not a city wide thing. With that said, I think the bus plan make sense and something I shouted to the rooftops about. Most cities with low density and low finances will opt for BRT as it makes more financial and logistical sense. If that route grows and finances are in place, then converting the line to a light rail system is easy as you already have the protected lanes in place. I do think however that Indy should build a streetcar system to connect different areas of downtown. This is the same thing that Tucson, Cincy, Kenosha WI, Portland, and Seattle have done. This allows for easy connections to downtown POI, and allows for more dense growth. Connecting the stadiums to the zoo, convention center, future transit center, and the mall would be one streetcar line that makes sense.