Few surprises in Oscar nominations

February 2, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Just as movie trailers tend to give away so much that the films themselves can sometimes seem redundant, all of the lead-up blather can make the announcement of the Oscar nominees an anticlimax.

Just a few minutes ago, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences announced its nominees for this year and only a small handful of choices are likely to raise an eyebrow. Interesting that Matt Damon scored for Supporting Actor in "Invictus." And that Maggie (driving spell check crazy) Gyllenhaal made it for "Crazy Heart." And a shame that "(500) Days of Summer" was roundly ignored.

Doubling the number of Best Picture nominations made that category open to such films as "District 9" and "A Serious Man" that otherwise would have been ignored. Unfortunately, the Academy only made room for one animated film, taking "Up" but leaving out the wonderful "Fantastic Mr. Fox." And where the heck is "Where the Wild Things Are"? That remarkable film scored exactly zero nominations--not even one for adapted screenplay.

Deeper into the category list, it's no surprise that "The Weary Kind" was nominated for Best Song (Let's see them turn that into a big production number). It's up against two Randy Newman "Princess and the Frog" tunes, one from "Nine," and something that doesn't stand a chance from a film called "Paris 36."

I'm always hoping to see films that were screened at the Heartland Film Festival or Indianapolis International Film Festival show up in the documentary, short film, or other categories. This year (and this is a correction from an earlier draft of this post), Heartlanders can cheer on "Kavi," while IIFF-ites can root for "Miracle Fish." Alas, no nom for Hal Holbrook, who gave what I think is the performance of the year in "That Evening Sun," which screened at Heartland.

In all, it looks like a year I'll be rooting against some films (""Avatar" and "Inglourious Basterds") rather than for others.

Then again, I still have to see "District 9," "An Education," "Precious," and "A Serious Man," so maybe there's hope.

Your thoughts?

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Goodnight "Moon"
    I must admit I was a bit disappointed to see that Sam Rockwell had been ignored for a Best Actor nomination for his role in "Moon." His performance was transcedent. I applaud the noms "The Hurt Locker" received - and will be glued to the tube to watch the ceremony.
  • Seven to see
    Looks like I'll be spending some time in the dark before March 7th. The 10 Best Picture nominees are killing me - especially considering that I'm going to have to see District 9. Of the ones I've seen (which do not include Avatar, An Education and A Serious Man), I have to say I'm not bubbling over with enthusiasm for any above the others. Lots of good movies; no great stand outs. Glad to see Maggie Gyllenhaal get nominated. Looking forward to the arrival of The Last Station. Ahhh...I love Oscar season!
  • An Education
    An Education was a very good movie. Every year it seems the same people and movies get a certain "buzz," and that determines the trajectory the awards will take. The Oscars have never been especially meaningful or fair, but at least they used to be fun and capable of surprises.
  • Happy Surprises
    This year had some surprises, but most of them were actually good ones. Yes we had the insanely flawed Blind Side up for Best Picture, but we also had An Education and A Serious Man up for the same honor. Those are two movies that I really adored and hopefully more people will see them now.

    Ultimately, the coolest nomination was In the Loop actually received a nomination for Best Adapted Screenplay. This was easily my favorite comedy of the year and almost no one saw it.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT