Review: Dance Kaleidoscope's "Love Is..."

March 5, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The beauty in Dance Kaleidoscope's "Love Is..." program may be only skin deep, but that's enough to make it a satisfying evening of emotionally moving theater. (I caught the March 4 preview. The show runs through March 7).

It opened with "Love Letter," a 2001 piece whose Sam Shepard poetry (recorded by Butler University's Diane Timmerman) proved an awkward match to Cynthia Pratt's choreography. Over-amplification seemed the prime culpret, repeatedly stepping on the subtleties of the dancers. In "Love Letter," five synchronized couples break out into individually paired portraits, offering a charming sensuality I've rarely scene on the IRT stage.

David Hochoy's simple, lovely "For Jose," proved the highlight of the evening. Set to Barbara Cook's prestine performance of Rodgers and Hammerstein's "This Nearly Was Mine," it exquisitely brought together then, sadly, separated dancers Timothy June and Noah Trulock. A mid-piece near-kiss led me to believe that Hochoy was backing away from his obvious subject. But a closing, tender moment made clear that DK trusted its audience's maturity.

The first act ended with guest choreographer Nicholas Owens'  "Love Key,' which proved visually arrested but didn't take the audience anywhere unfamiliar or new as a faux-Juliet (backed by boys in silly outfits) faced off against a Romeo-lite (backed by a Soviet-block military movers).

The second act was filled entirely with Hochoy's 1995 piece "Love Songs," with the rich tenor of Steven Stolen often flying into Mandy Patinkin land (particularly on the final piece, "Over the Rainbow") with pianist Catherine Bringerud provided strong support. The piece is structured as a series of loves lost, with the abandoned partner finding the next, who is abandoned and finds the next, etc.

While the varied music and dance energy -- and the passion of the performers (particularly George Salinas, Melanie Schreiber, and Mariel Greenlee) -- kept things interesting, the "La Ronde"-like piece didn't journey toward any place unexpected. Like "Love Key," it felt like a young (bordering on naive) choreographer's work. And while I certainly enjoyed and recommend the evening, I also left yearning for DK to find ideas as rich as its choreographic and dance talent.

But perhaps that's too much to expect from an evening dedicated to the heart and not the head.


At the performance, David Hochoy and DK Executive Director Jan Virgin announced the company's 2010/2011 season, which will open with a "Mad for Musicals" program featuring rethinking of Broadway dance by both Hochoy and Nicholas Owens. January brings "The Elvis Project," from Hochoy and Cynthia Pratt. March offers "Passionate Puccini." The season closes with "A Body Electric," featuring live music from Cathy Morris.

Your thoughts?


Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now