The incredibly expanding theater seat

New and renovated theaters have bigger seats to fill

July 14, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

 

A new study, conducted by design company Theatre Projects Consultants,  reports that (surprise), Americans are getting bigger--and so are our theater seats.

A typical theater seat in 2010, the study notes, was 23" wide and 38" away from the back of the seat in front or behind it. Compare that to a 20" seat with 33" separation in 1990. Take it back to the end of the 1800s and you have 18"-wide seats with 24" of separation

The size isn't just a commentary on our size and expectations of comfort. There's an economic impact for the theaters.

A space that, could contain ten of today's seats would have handled 13 seats in 1990 and twenty seats in 1900. To get specific, American Airlines Theatre in New York holds 740 seats since its 2000 renovation. When it originally opened in 1918 as the Selwyn Theatre, it had 1,180 seats.

The study notes another downside:

"The theater designer can now fit half the seats (and patrons) in the same footprint as a century ago. Lower seating density means reduced intimacy, and less attention and 'energy' returned to the performer. Our colleague Iain Mackintosh asks'“What does this then mean for the actor?' and answers himself 'It means that in a space loosely packed with expensive seats a full house gives the response received from a half house at the old densities.'"

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Palladium
    I understand the Palladium was constructed taking in the points you mentioned above. They came to the conclusion biggest is not always the best. The Palladium concert hall will have 1600 seats and the Booth Tarkington Theater will have 500 to produce an optimium experience for all.
  • Palladium
    I understand the Palladium was constructed taking in the points you mentioned above. They came to the conclusion biggest is not always the best. The Palladium concert hall will have 1600 seats and the Booth Tarkington Theater will have 500 to produce an optimium experience for all.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Any "Domestic Partner Registry" is subject to significant fraud just like the recent media investigation showing huge problems with the Indiana Sex and Violent Offender Registry.

    What prevents people from claiming benefits from more than one employer for more than one "partner"?

    Don't see the HR department conducting sex & committed relationship audits with home visits?

  2. Words cannot adequated express how riduculous this is. How can anyone go from 8.8 million to 29.2 million (thanks for the $4 gas prices by the way)??

  3. As the city is increasing employee costs, lowering insurance coverages, and completely dropping city/county benefit coverage for employed spouses/kids employed elsewhere, they want to start covering homosexual partners, girl/boy friends, and unemployed room mates?

  4. "At the heart of the change, said Speedway executives, is creating an event that is more friendly toward the track’s corporate partners." What about the fan? For the first time in my 15 years going to the track, I was confined to three small, cramped sections of turn 4 on Pole Day. Not enjoyable. Sponsors banners may generate revenue in the short term, but I don't see IMS/IndyCar doing anything to make the product they are selling more desirable. Sponsors only come where the fans are, so seems to me they have to do something to get more fans in the seats before selling advertising space on the walls. And 220 MPH ain't going to do it!

  5. TV ratings anyone? Name a driver that is not Penske or Ganassi? Ads on the turns? "It's a business..." that is the problem. It's racing and they are ruining it. Tony H. is spinning.

ADVERTISEMENT