The incredibly expanding theater seat

New and renovated theaters have bigger seats to fill

July 14, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 

A new study, conducted by design company Theatre Projects Consultants,  reports that (surprise), Americans are getting bigger--and so are our theater seats.

A typical theater seat in 2010, the study notes, was 23" wide and 38" away from the back of the seat in front or behind it. Compare that to a 20" seat with 33" separation in 1990. Take it back to the end of the 1800s and you have 18"-wide seats with 24" of separation

The size isn't just a commentary on our size and expectations of comfort. There's an economic impact for the theaters.

A space that, could contain ten of today's seats would have handled 13 seats in 1990 and twenty seats in 1900. To get specific, American Airlines Theatre in New York holds 740 seats since its 2000 renovation. When it originally opened in 1918 as the Selwyn Theatre, it had 1,180 seats.

The study notes another downside:

"The theater designer can now fit half the seats (and patrons) in the same footprint as a century ago. Lower seating density means reduced intimacy, and less attention and 'energy' returned to the performer. Our colleague Iain Mackintosh asks'“What does this then mean for the actor?' and answers himself 'It means that in a space loosely packed with expensive seats a full house gives the response received from a half house at the old densities.'"

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Palladium
    I understand the Palladium was constructed taking in the points you mentioned above. They came to the conclusion biggest is not always the best. The Palladium concert hall will have 1600 seats and the Booth Tarkington Theater will have 500 to produce an optimium experience for all.
  • Palladium
    I understand the Palladium was constructed taking in the points you mentioned above. They came to the conclusion biggest is not always the best. The Palladium concert hall will have 1600 seats and the Booth Tarkington Theater will have 500 to produce an optimium experience for all.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT