Review: 'Two Gentlemen of Verona'

August 12, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One of the challenges of staging some of Shakespeare's comedies is figuring out how to make their endings satisfying and palatable to contemporary audiences.

Times, it is true, change. And where once--in the most obvious example--the "taming" of fiery Kate in "The Taming of the Shrew" was just peachy, these days directors must wrestle with whether to modify the original message or embrace the period.
 
In "Two Gentlemen of Verona," the "happy" ending includes one of the titular gentlemen, who has betrayed his lover and his best friend in pursuit of the latter's love, returning to his first intended with barely an apology. Marriage is next. End of story. "All's well that ends well," a 1760s audience might have said--and who cares what the women were feeling anyway? But today it's harder to feel that same joy.
 
The engaging production of the play staged at White River State Park Aug. 6-8 by Heartland Actors' Repertory Theatre didn't solve the problem--it kind of barreled through it to the curtain call. But, to its credit, the lack of attention to the issue didn't take much away from the evening. Prior to the less-than-satisfying ending, HART effectively delivered nearly three hours of smiles in an easily understood, gracefully designed and lit production (aided and abetted, until the sun went down, by the White River shimmering behind it).
 
Adriano Gatto as the betraying gentleman and Chris Hatch as his best buddy grounded the problematic play while clowns R. Brian Noffke, Ryan Artzberger and Casper the Dog (in a remarkably lengthy canine role) scored well-deserved laughs in the more comedic parts. The women--including a generic Silvia, passion-generator for both gents--weren't quite working at the same level, but Shakespeare gave them less to go on so allowances should be made.
 
With three years of summer Shakespeare under its belt--and with these "Gentlemen" a notch in quality above last year's "Much Ado About Nothing,"--let's hope that an institution has been born. Expanding the show this year to three (free!) performances bodes well for HART taking an anchoring role in Indy's summer cultural life. As soon as the next show is announced, I'll be putting it in my datebook.
 
Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.

ADVERTISEMENT