Review: IndyFringe 2010, pt. 1

August 20, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Depending on how you are counting, tonight (Friday, Aug. 20) was either the first or the second night of this year's Indy Fringe festival.

While it was the first night for ticketed shows, the festivities actually began on Thursday, with the Opening Night Carnival. That event included an opportunity for most of the productions to make two-minute presentations in an effort to inspire ticket buying.

Most, alas, made a better case for not seeing their shows. Only a few, in my book, moved from a "skip" to a "maybe" or from a "maybe" into a "must see." Two winners, in two-minute form, were Shanna Shrum of Chicago, star of "Skinny Dipping--Not Your Mama's One-Woman Show!" and Orlando's Dewey Chafee and Douglas McGoech, offering "The Screw You Review." I now hope to get to both to see what these attention-getters can do with 50 minutes.

I appreciated the chance to thin the herd, though. At best, I'll be seeing nine or ten shows over the next few days (an out-of-town trip is cutting into my Fringe-ing this year) and so selections must be made.

For the first actual night of shows, I went with three, for varying reasons.

1. "The Four Food Groups"

Reason for picking it: I wanted to make sure that my choices weren't too conventional and a show awarded "Most Fringey Show" at the 2009  Cincy Fringe seemed a promising pick.

Reaction: Here's one where form won out over content. Using rhythmic, sometimes synchronized movements and mostly generalized dialogue, four appealing, well-rehearsed performers covered oh-so-familiar relationship territory (At one point, the four food groups are stated as "Loneliness, Commitment, The Gray Area, and Just Friends") in and around a dinner table. For a moment, toward the end, it began to turn into a lecture, but not one that fit the course that came before it. As to being the Fringiest show in Cincy, well, maybe our Ohio friends are shocked by actors in their undies and some "When Harry Met Sally" moaning.

2. "Not a Peep"

Reason for picking it: Sometimes, you go with your past experience with a company. In this case, a Fringe show from Indy's whenever-they-feel-like-it theater ShadowApe Theatre Company is an automatic must-see.

Reaction: It's wonderful when high expectations are satisfied (and then some). The gloriously fun main piece feels like "The Office" meets "The Ernie Kovacs Show" (Don't remember TV groundbreaker Ernie Kovacs? Then click here.) The clean-up-the-stage bit is inspired. And while the cell-phone piece is well constructed, its "message" comes across a bit heavy. Still, the impeccable cast (Jennifer Johansen, Constance Macy and Ben Tebbe) are inspired throughout and the entire show set the bar very, very high for this year's Fringe.

3. "Deep in Love/For Adults Only"

Reason for picking it: To hear Deborah Asante tell stories.

Reaction: The show (which changes with every performance) hints at ways that music, joke-telling, and storytelling can come together for an entertaining evening and I hope the show continues to evolve and find its ideal balance. On opening night, the keyboardist set just the right atmosphere and the emcee disappeared after just one (funny) joke. As for the star of the show, she was engaging and entertaining throughout, but her first story--a tale of lust set near the famed rural crossroads where Robert Johnson met the devil. Asante builds up a good head of narrative steam, but the tale fizzed in an uncharacteristic "Fried Green Tomatoes"/"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" ending. The story and the characters deserved better. Her second tale, about a lonely woman and her new pet, was more successful, with big smiles leading the way to a big punch line ending.

More Fringe on Saturday. See you there.

Your thoughts?

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT