Review: IndyFringe 2010, pt. 2

August 23, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Another day, another trio of IndyFringe shows.

But first, I should note that the Mass Ave. street life on Saturday was more lively than I've ever seen it. That, in part, had to do with the biggie sizing of the Fringe tent and surrounding area and the buskers performing up and down the street (Kudos to the person or people who came up with the slow-motion and moustache zones on a stretch of the sidewalk).

As important as what Indy Fringe brought to the street, however, is what Indy audiences are bringing to it. There was a palpable sense of adventure--an enthusiastic what-the-heckness about the attendees. Young families, teens, hipster daters, retirees, gangs of grown-ups, and just about anyone who is anyone in local theater were all making the rounds. 

I'm guessing record crowds this year, but it's still earlier.

Anyway, on to the shows. On Saturday, I caught three.

1. "Blizzard Rewind"

Reason for picking it: I wanted to see what the Bloomington Playwrights Project would bring to the Fringe table. In case you aren't aware, BPP is solely dedicated to presenting new work. And as far as I know it's the only theater that guarantees that you enjoy the work during its mainstage season (which begins in October). If you see something that you don't like, you can turn your ticket in at the end for one for another show. More info on BPP here.

Reaction: The gimmick here is that the six-member ensemble has a short-short play for every one of the 30 years BPP has existed. The years and titles are written on dry erase boards on stage and are presented in random order, based on the shouted-out whims of the audience. A countdown timer for the whole show is projected onto the back of the stage. The device gives participatory fun to the proceedings, with sketches covering such once-hot topics as Bill Clinton's indiscretions, Y2K, and the downgrading of the planet Pluto. What is, by definition, dated material gets new life, though, thanks to and the playfulness of the theatrical device imposed on it. It wouldn't work, though, without the spirited and talented cast (better than other sketch companies I've seen in previous Fringe years) that keeps the energy high. And with scenes rarely lasting more than a minute or two, the duds fly by quickly, the hits generating big bursts of laughs..

2. "Grind: The Musical"

Reason for picking it: I'm a sucker for new musicals, as difficult as they are to create and pull off effectively.

Reaction: This earnestly performed coffee-shop-set cliche fest comes across as a "Rent"-wannabee where the characters all have a few extra bucks for lattes. Younger brother plays keyboards at the shop while going to college. Older sister runs the joint. There's a street preacher, a secret blogger, a closet rapper from New Orleans and, of course, an eviction notice. Promising use of shadow puppetry in the beginning--as well as mock noir narration--is largely dropped once conventional story begins and the songs (including one with what seems like a clear lift from Harry Chapin) kick in. Still, it's nice to know that young people in Minneapolis hate their town, too.

For the record, this isn't to be confused at all with the Ben Vereen musical "Grind."

3. "Screw You Revue."

Reason for picking it: Fun sample at Thursday's preview. Plus the fact that it was co-created by the head of Orlando Fringe, someone who should know a little something about the genre.

Reaction: Blissfully outrageous fun, "Screw You Review" has one foot in the offend-everyone tradition of Don Rickles and Lisa Lapanelli and another in the world of drag review. The result is a unexpected marriage made in a very tolerant comedic heaven. Dewey Chafee plays Wayburn Sassy, an 89-year-old true-to-his-name guy with no filter between brain and mouth. His partner is Didi Panache (played by Douglas McGeoch) a sweet songstress with great gams. Together they brought down a sell-out house with did-they-really-say-that? jokes, knowing-when-to-quit audience participation, and a couple of really fun songs. While Sassy, if real, would be terribly offensive, the show itself isn't because of the commitment to the character and to the best comic timing you are likely to see at this or any other Fringe.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Rent? Really?
    Since I have not seen the other two shows, I cannot vouch for them, but they certainly sound promising. I did, however, catch Grind at 1:30 today. I've listened to Rent quite a bit and I fail to see the similarities. None of the characters of rent seem to mirror Grind's at all as the review claims.

    Now that I've got that out of the way, here're my thoughts. I hate things that state they are a musical in the title. It makes me think that there isn't much plot and that the show is more of an exploration of a theme or noun. The shadow puppetry didn't really seem consistent with the way I imagine comic books at all besides the fact that they tried to tell a story with image as well as text. And while the idea of a film-noir-esque narrator is a nice touch, it is fairly inconsistent with the actual tone and content of the show. I understand that they only have an hour to wrap everything up, but the ending was a bit too convenient to be believable. The actors tried really hard with their characters, but some of them seemed kind of cliche and flat. However, I really enjoyed the music and I think the show has potential if they had the time to actually flesh things out. Overall I'd give it a 3.5/5 stars, but since the cast was so dedicated to the show, and since it seemed like they were having a ton of fun, I think it really deserves a 4/5.

    4/5 stars. A promising start for what could one day be a decent musical.
  • Lanterns
    Didn't go to the fringe (though I'm sure I would have liked it). Went to the Feast of Lanterns, though, and enjoyed it.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT