A-list nonsense

September 24, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Once again, The Indy Channel has announced the names of its annual A-list winners and, once again, it's nonsense.

The A-list, for those who have only seen the boasts by past winners, presents as a popularity contest. But like most such media-driven competitions, its winners are determined in large part by how much the organizations push their friends, family and supporters to vote for them.

As such, it reflects the agenda of those who are lobbying for votes.

Through that lobbying, all the groups are helping to advertise The Indy Channel. It's a smart move by the marketing folks at the station, of course--get groups hungry for attention to spread the word for you. And I totally understand "winners" taking advantage of the notice in their advertising and PR.

But come on.

Do you really think anyone who voted for Best Personal Trainers has tried more than one (if any)? How many different carpet cleaners has any of the voters used? And don't get me started about pet photography.

As to the Arts & Entertainment category, sorry, but unless you don't want your kid to grow into a rational human being, Irvington Ghost Tours isn't the best place for Family Fun. And while a case can be made for Conner Prarie as the best museum, with so little production and presenting going on, it's difficult to rationalize Madame Walker Theatre Center as Best Theater. And I applaud Actors Theatre of Indiana for getting out the vote, but that doesn't make it the Best Theatre Company in the region.

Sure, we all have opinions. And I did my time editing "reader's choice" lists for Philadelphia Magazine and Indianapolis Monthly's "Best of" issues back in the day. I just wish lists such The Indy Channel' s actually reflected opinions or actual surveys rather than marketing strategies. I'd rather hear what a specific arts journalist at the station thought of a show or company rather than the results of a contest hiding beyond a pretend "popular vote."

But in a world where PR people posing as "citizen journalists" can post on news websites without being challenged, I shouldn't be surprised.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT