Would 'Spider-man' be your first Broadway musical choice?

December 1, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 

I'm fascinated by the amount of attention that "Spider-man: Turn Off the Dark" is generated. I'm not surprised, just fascinated.  When was the last time a Broadway show was the subject of national press--and a joke on late-night talk shows?

The reasons for the attention are pretty clear:

1. It's the most expensive show ever produced on Broadway, doubling the cost of the one it surpassed ("Shrek: The Musical").

2. It's director Julie Taymor's first family-friendly, high-profile B'way show since "The Lion King" in 1997.

3. It's a high-tech production, which means its glitches are big and obvious.

4. We live in a time of endless internet chatter, turning reports of those first preview glitches into gossip fodder.

5. Bono and the Edge wrote the music.

6. It seems to have smart PR people behind it.

7: It's about Spider-man. Duh. (Trivia note: This isn't the first superhero musical on Broadway. Anyone remember "It's a Bird...It's a Plane...It's Superman!" or, for that matter, "Starmites"?)

What frustrates me is that, at the same time, Broadway's "The Scottsboro Boys," with music and lyrics by Kander and Ebb, has announced that it is closing after only about six weeks.

No, I haven't seen it, but this is one of the few musicals currently on Broadway that isn't a revival or based on a film, familiar pop culture characters, or a song catalogue. The others on that short list? "Memphis," "Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson," "In the Heights" and "Next to Normal."

I understand completely that those shows have less story value for today's media than "Spider-man." But here's hoping that the web-slinging guy, successful or not (financially or artistically), doesn't push truly original musicals further to the fringe.

(Oh, and if you can't afford tickets to "Spider-man: Turn Off the Dark," you can at least enjoy, for free, "Dr. Horrible's Sing Along Blog" starring Neil Patrick Harris. Find the first episode here.)

Your thoughts?

If you were in New York City and had the means, would "Spider-man" be your first musical choice?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Mud slinging
    I saw the "60 Minutes" installment on the show last weekend and a lot of the other media reports. The press has been particularly gleeful in reporting what appears to be a massive act of hubris involving some high-profile people ripe for a fall, but judging from what I heard of the score and saw of the aerial stunts, it's going to be a spectacular show when they work out the glitches.
  • It just so happens
    I'm heading to NYC next week and I'll be seeing Spider Man. I'm hopeful that a week and a half or two will be enough time for the glitches will be worked out.

    I'll try to report back what I see.
  • I wuz there
    Went to the first preview at the end of a marathon show weekend over Thanksgiving- 7 shows. Spidey needs a lot of work, but the costumes, set and acrobatics are spectacular. The music - nothing memorable. The Geek (not Greek) chorus - confusing. The story - drags a little. This show needs to be tightened up. Worth seeing - sure - assuming that a lot of work is done. But first see Memphis, Million Dollar Quartet and La Bette. (And Wicked if you haven't been.) And if its still there - do not miss Merchant of Venice - fantastic production - Pacino is great. Scottboro was good but not great - minstrel approach just didn't work for me - but great cast. Bloody, Bloody - not my cup of tea - but very creative in an offbeat sort of way. And Elf - also worth seeing - is very well done given it has a classic movie to live up to. Lots of good shows to see.
  • Quite possible
    I'll be there over New Year's and it's definitely on the short list, especially since it's still in previews...could be fun, will definitely be interesting.
  • To answer your question...
    ...No, Spider-Man would not my first choice. I wasn't a huge a fan of the movie versions of Spider-Man, so maybe that has something to do with it. However, for me, there are so many other shows I would prefer to see first. BTW, if you haven't seen Fela!, it is absolutely amazing, and is only on Broadway for a few more weeks. Fela! was probably one of the best musicals I have seen, if not the best!
  • Inflation
    Spiderman would not be my first choice as I believe the ticket price is way above any show I have ever seen in New York. Big production costs big ticket price. I believe the story I saw on a morning show stated that tickts (good tickets) were going to cost around $285 a piece. One could see several broadway productions for that kind of change
  • Worth noting...
    It might be worth noting that former Indianapolis native Luther Creek ("Rent", "Urinetown") is in "Spider-man: TOTD".
  • more closings
    More info:

    "Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson," "Next to Normal," and "In the Heights" are all set to close in Janury.
  • First on my list
    I can't wait to go see Spider-Man. I've not bought tickets yet, and probably won't get back to NYC until at least this spring, but once they get the kinks worked out it should be Spectaular and Amazing!
  • Spiderman on my list
    I'll be in New York this weekend and Spiderma in previews is my firs choice if I can score a ticket. I'm courious to see the effects and hear the music.

    I've seen a number of shows in previews over the years and they have ranged from the biggest bomb - CARRIE THE MUSICAL.....to one of my most delighful evenings on Broadway - JEROME ROBBINS BROADWAY.

  • No to Spiderman...
    I'm visiting NYC in January and will not be seeing Spiderman. We saw "Million Dollar Quartet" and "Memphis" in April, and we LOVED both, especially "Memphis." Hoping to have just as good of an experience next month. Any suggestions for other shows, Lou, especially since several notables will be closing?

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT