The Cultural Tourist, NYC: 'Hair'

July 14, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Greetings from New York, where I’ll be spending a few days blogging about entertainment on Broadway and beyond as part of a Creative Renewal Grant from the Arts Council of Indianapolis.

Click here for more info—and for an account of a recent Washington, D.C., trek.

First stop, a revisit to the Broadway revival of “Hair.” Reopening for a summer (of love) run, the 2009 production remains in strong shape, despite only one of the leads still with the show (the radiant Kacie Sheik at Jeanie, the pregnant one).

Seeing it two years ago, I commented: “I'm very pleased to report that the musical groundbreaker's latest incarnation isn't a plotless nostalgia piece for aging hippies (which it could have been). Nor is it an over-romanticized vision of a complex, turbulent period (which it also could have been). Instead, it's a hugely satisfying piece of theater. The terrific score (including hits "Aquarius" and "Let the Sun Shine") is intact, but time—and the talented production team—have rendered it more powerful with an added layer of truly moving melancholy. When the tribe demands "Peace now/Freedom now," their optimism, anger, disappointment, confusion and sadness are palpable.” I stand by all of that in the latest incarnation.

In the revisit, Paris Remillard takes over as the conflicted Claude, and while he doesn’t possess as strong as voice as Gavin Creel, he feels more natural in the part. And his transformation at the end is shocking and powerful. Steel Burkhardt (no, not everyone on Broadway has a porn name) keeps the obnoxious Berger from being too alienating. Matt DeAngelis is a winningly sweet Woof contrasted with Darius Nichols as a hardened Hud. And Josh Lamon might as well be three different actors, creating sharp and nuanced personas for his tribe member, Claude’s Dad, and the note-stretching Margaret Mead.

Except for Sheik, the women are strong but don’t pop in the way that this productions original cast did. Kaitlin Kiyan has a golden voice as Chrissy, but her solo spot, the charmingly wispy “Frank Mills” needs vulnerability, not vocal smoothness. Caren Lyn Tackett’s toughened Sheila effectively holds her own again Berger, but comes across way too old for the part.

Still, “Hair” grows for me with each production. Again, I found myself moved in surprising moments, aching as these raggedy individuals struggle with the limitations of their flesh, try to change the world with their voices, and stumble toward finding peace with a world where death may be just a draft card away.
I’d see it again this week if schedule permitted. But there’s a lot of other things to see. Stay tuned for my thoughts on “Priscilla Queen of the Desert,” “Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark,” and more.

Your thoughts?

  • Hair in Chicago
    We made the drive to Chicago to catch the tour last May before it returned to Broadway. Every time I see the show, I pick up something different. Wish I were going to be able to catch it in NYC, but it will be back out on tour before my next trip back. Better yet, wish it would get to Indy on tour.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I could be wrong, but I don't think Butler views the new dorm as mere replacements for Schwitzer and or Ross.

  2. An increase of only 5% is awesome compared to what most consumers face or used to face before passage of the ACA. Imagine if the Medicaid program had been expanded to the 400k Hoosiers that would be eligible, the savings would have been substantial to the state and other policy holders. The GOP predictions of plan death spirals, astronomical premium hikes and shortages of care are all bunk. Hopefully voters are paying attention. The Affordable Care Act (a.k.a Obamacare), where fully implemented, has dramatically reduced the number of uninsured and helped contained the growth in healthcare costs.

  3. So much for competition lowering costs.

  4. As I understand the proposal, Keystone would take on the debt, not the city/CRC. So the $104K would not be used to service the $3.8M bond. Keystone would do that with its share.

  5. Adam C, if anything in Carmel is "packed in like sardines", you'll have to show me where you shop for groceries. Based on 2014 population estimates, Carmel has around 85,000 people spread across about 48 square miles, which puts its density at well below 1800 persons/sq mi, which is well below Indianapolis (already a very low-density city). Noblesville is minimally less dense than Carmel as well. The initiatives over the last few years have taken what was previously a provincial crossroads with no real identity beyond lack of poverty (and the predictably above-average school system) and turned it into a place with a discernible look, feel, and a center. Seriously, if you think Carmel is crowded, couldn't you opt to live in the remaining 95% of Indiana that still has an ultra-low density development pattern? Moreover, if you see Carmel as "over-saturated" have you ever been to Chicago--or just about any city outside of Indiana?