Libman leaves as Center for the Performing Arts boss

July 29, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Just about a week before the grand opening of the third and final theater in the Center for the Performing Arts, Steven Libman has resigned as President and CEO. 
 
Yes, I'm asking the same question. What happened?
 
The vague official statement speaks to "personal reasons" and "other opportunities." I'm sure more info will come out shortly. Libman's stints have been short elsewhere--he spent only about three years at La Jolla Playhouse--so this doesn't come as a big shock. Still, the timing is odd. In the world of arts management, this seemed like a pretty sweet gig.
 
I'm sure more will come out in the days to come.
 
In the meantime, the Tarkington Theatre will host a kids event on Saturday and an open house on Sunday--which has a planned ribbon cutting with Libman.
 
Who's in charge now? Frank Basile has been appointed interim President/CEO beginning today. Basile, who also writes for IBJ, is a noted arts philanthropist and community leader. Board chairman Rollin M. Dick says a national search for a full-time replacement immediately.
 
Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Sweet Gig?
    Is he bored in Indiana? Can't imagine its a pay issue, at $250,000 per. Rumors are that the PAC will need even more tax $$ very soon, so maybe he's just gettin' while the gettin' is good?
  • My thoughts
    Personally, I think is was the heat that got him. :-)
    • Just sayin'
      He came here from LaJolla - it's just about perfect there!

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

    2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

    3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

    4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

    5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

    ADVERTISEMENT