REVIEW: David Hyde Pierce and Michael Feinstein open the Tarkington

August 7, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

There weren’t any surprises—just lots of good spirits—tonight at the gala celebrating the opening of the third theater at Carmel’s Center for the Performing Arts.

Although there was much off-stage chatter about what happened to suddenly resigned head honcho Steven Libman, on stage at the Tarkington, the opening speeches and making-of-the-theater video presentation were focused on the future.  

Entertainment-wise, things got off to a slightly awkward start. I didn’t quite understand why we then were shown a movie montage of early Hollywood set to Judy Garland singing “Over the Rainbow.” Yes, it’s lovely. But we knew that. And what does that have to do with this show. Then Michael Feinstein offered into a video-clip-synched “That’s Entertainment,” which included additional, lesser lyrics (perhaps the ones added for the film “That’s Entertainment, Part II,” but I’m not certain). Did I really hear something about “More can happen on a silver screen/then can happen on a stage”? Really? Then why didn’t Carmel build a multiplex instead?

Carmel’s own Julia Bonnett, winner of the 2009 Great American Songbook High School Competition was in good voice for her one song, “Maybe This Time,” and American Ballet Theatre dancers Gennadi Saveliev and Stella Abrera were solid but surprisingly lacked passion in the bedroom pas de deux from “Le Corsaire.”

Feinstein later proved himself in the banter (this time without the index cards that lent a feeling of phoniness to the Palladium opening). His “Bad Songs by Great Songwriters” intro, including a reference to the Gershwin’s “"If I Can't Have-Anna In Cuba, Then I'll See-EstherIn Spain,” was particularly fun. Rather than sing a dud, though, he launched into “Time After Time.” (The one by Sammy Cahn and Jule Styne, not the one by Cindi Lauper—but she’ll be at the Palladium soon if you want to hear that one.)

Feinstein stayed on after introducing David Hyde Pierce, star of Broadway’s “Curtains” and “Monty Python’s Spamalot.” The duo sang “Together with Music,” a lesser tune saved by Pierce’s good humor in the playful addition of other buddy songs, including “Tea for Two” and “Side by Side.”

Pierce—who jokingly claimed that he didn’t read the contract carefully and thought he’d be playing in Carmel, California—watched from a stool by the piano as Feinstein delivered his strongest song of the evening, “I Want to Be Around to Pick Up the Pieces.” The playful tune also afforded the onstage combo an opportunity to shine brightly.

A “Hello, Dolly!” cut number, “Penny in My Pocket,” played to Pierce’s character-driven strengths, leading to the mutual-admiration-society anthem “You’re the Top” with Feinstein. Without augmented lyrics, thank you.

Pierce’s showpiece “Spamalot” number, “You Won’t Succeed on Broadway” and a Feinstein/Pierce four-handed piano action climaxed the show. But Feinstein once again had to have the last song, with more out-of-place Hollywood video.

Then it was off to buffet stations. And more talk of the future for Carmel’s now-complete three-theater complex, whose Tarkington will soon house the work of the Booth Tarkington Civic Theatre, Gregory Hancock Dance Theatre, and more.

Your thoughts?

  • What a Swell Party
    Now, can we please raise the artistic level above that of a cocktail lounge in the local bowling alley.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...