Do TV dance shows add to live dance audiences?

October 6, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

This weekend, both Dance Kaleidoscope and Gregory Hancock Dance Theatre offer their season-opening programs (at the IRT and the Tarkington, respectively). In addition, Campania Flamenca Jose Porcel will be performing at the Palladium on the 12th.

Are you going to any or all?

Whether you are or aren't, I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on the impact of such hit shows as "So You Think You Can Dance?" and "Dancing with the Stars" on live dance The obvious assumption is that seeing more dance on TV should inspire more people to experience dance live.

But is that the case?

Do people still stay away, assuming they can't see that quality on local stages? Is dance something most people would prefer seeing on TV instead of live? Or are there other barriers keeping potential ticket-buyers from taking the leap?

If they do go, I'm curious about how the expectations created by these flashy programs impact appreciation for the more subtle, lengthier work locally. Can--and should--our dancers live up to the three-minute choreographed blasts offered just about every night on TV?

Whether you are a dance or a patron, a choreographer or someone considering a first visit to live dance, chime in below with your thoughts.

Your thoughts?

  • thought from a lay person
    I don't think that they should try to live up to the shows on TV. Both formats - TV and live - should be taken as they are and appreciated for what they are worth. I would watch a TV show and appreciate how I can see a few minutes of a visually impressive dance from the comfort of my home. On the other hand, I would also go to a live performance and appreciate a more in-depth experience for all my senses...and the lack of judges giving out grades. By trying to make every live performance the same experience as a TV you are doing a disservice to those in attendance. They would never get the opportunity to appreciate the differences and benefits only a live performance can offer.
    • thoughts from a dancer/choreographer
      Live art (dance) in Indy compared to other markets has always had a tough time pulling patrons into the theatres. World renowned and flashy productions struggle, even the SYTYCD live shows struggle on tour, and they are the very same show that has such a following nation wide (myself included). There is INCREDIBLE talent in Indy, and DK and GHDT have been very fortunate to keep the spirit of dance alive in the city. They produce amazing work and have grueling hours of rehearsals in preparation for the end product. But it's tough to get people to committ to attend that aren't maybe involved in the arts or long time lovers of dance; most of the GP (general public) don't understand what their watching and sometimes it can be too deep for a times its even too deep for the avid dancer (ha).
      we all are aware of the camera angles and shots tv uses...they tend to make things appear more dynamic (even for the most amazing choreography and dancers) than maybe it is in real life. And while the athletes rarely have a less than stellar performances, the TV aspect can add to, but also take away from the quality. I find it hard at times to watch some of the routines on tv because I want to see, as a whole, what is happening as opposed to a side view of the stage or one person. I, as a dancer and choreographer, always hope that the attention our art has gained because of these shows will be more of a drive to get people in the actual seats, and their kids in our studios. The students expanding to the studios is working...and I am confident that its just a matter of time before the seats are filled with excitement for the REAL DEAL! But no matter, we will keep creating and dancing! live, love, dance!
      • i hate typos
        most of the GP (general public) don't understand what *theyre* watching

        haha :)
      • :)
        agree completely jaclyn!

      Post a comment to this blog

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

      2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

      3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

      4. Send them back NOW.

      5. deport now