Oscar noms: Really?

January 24, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Initial thoughts on the Academy Award nominees, announced this morning:

 

BEST PICTURE

Film that made it in because of good intentions: “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close”

Films that made it in by virtue of the stature of their directors: “War Horse” and “Hugo.”

Film I haven’t seen yet: “Midnight in Paris”

Film with the most annoying voiceover crutch: “The Descendants”

Films that were overlooked: “Win Win” and “Coriolanus”

Film I’ll be rooting for as Best Picture: “Tree of Life”

Film I’ll happily settle for as Best Picture: “The Artist”

 

BEST ACTOR/ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE

Actor I’m glad to see in the mix: Demian Bichir

Actor who doesn’t deserve all of the nominations he gets: George Clooney

Actors who deserve it far more than Clooney: Ralph Fiennes in “Coriolanus” and Paul Giamatti in “Win Win”

Actress whose performance really should have been nominated for Best Supporting Actress: Viola Davis

Actresses who should have been in the mix: Tilda Swinton for “We Need to Talk About Kevin” and Elizabeth Olsen for “Martha Marcy May Marlene.”

 

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR/ACTRESS

Actor I’ve never for a second believed on film: Jonah Hill

Actor in a not very good film who deserves the recognition he got: Max von Sydow in “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close”

Actor oddly omitted after praise just about everywhere else: Albert Brooks in “Drive”

Actress I knew wouldn’t get nominated but was still quietly hoping for: Amy Ryan in “Win Win”

Actress who should have been in the mix: Vanessa Redgrave in “Coriolanus”

 

OTHER CATEGORIES

Documentary nominee I’m most looking forward to seeing: “Pina”

Nominated film score that got in the way of the film: John Williams’ “War Horse” score.

Oddly thin category: Only two nominations for Best Original Song

Films that will look the strangest when their DVD boxes says “Academy Award nominated”: “Real Steel” and “Transformers: Dark of the Moon”

 

For a complete list of nominees, click here.  

 

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • See it!
    I thought Midnight in Paris was an unexpected delight. Corey Stoll as Papa Hemingway was terrific, and - I'll out myself as a fan - I found Owen Wilson's character appropriately charming.

    Overall, I was happy to see many more plot-driven nominees this year after many, many years where everything is all about character with very little story to go on. I have six left to see to cover all the top five categories and look forward to this time every year - me spending blustery weekend afternoons in the dark!
  • Win Win--yes!
    Couldn't agree more that Win Win was a standout last year. Could this oversight be a matter of poor timing on when that film was released?
  • Win Win, the Pitts
    Agreed: Win Win is a best picture-level film, and Giamatti gives a fantastic performance.

    My only real surprise: That Brad Pitt was NOT nominated as "Best Actor Trying to Be Robert Redford" in Moneyball, a film that, despite plenty of weakness, I found myself really enjoying.
  • Agree to disagree
    Totally agree that Win Win should have been a Best Picture nominee - both my husband and I said that when we saw it months ago.

    However, could not disagree more with your assessment of War Horse. This is my Best Picture of the year - loved it, and everyone I know who has seen it says the same thing. Also think John Williams' score for the film is one of his best. Listening to the soundtrack in my office right now, as a matter of fact.

    Different strokes....

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT