Oscar noms: Really?

January 24, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Initial thoughts on the Academy Award nominees, announced this morning:

 

BEST PICTURE

Film that made it in because of good intentions: “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close”

Films that made it in by virtue of the stature of their directors: “War Horse” and “Hugo.”

Film I haven’t seen yet: “Midnight in Paris”

Film with the most annoying voiceover crutch: “The Descendants”

Films that were overlooked: “Win Win” and “Coriolanus”

Film I’ll be rooting for as Best Picture: “Tree of Life”

Film I’ll happily settle for as Best Picture: “The Artist”

 

BEST ACTOR/ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE

Actor I’m glad to see in the mix: Demian Bichir

Actor who doesn’t deserve all of the nominations he gets: George Clooney

Actors who deserve it far more than Clooney: Ralph Fiennes in “Coriolanus” and Paul Giamatti in “Win Win”

Actress whose performance really should have been nominated for Best Supporting Actress: Viola Davis

Actresses who should have been in the mix: Tilda Swinton for “We Need to Talk About Kevin” and Elizabeth Olsen for “Martha Marcy May Marlene.”

 

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR/ACTRESS

Actor I’ve never for a second believed on film: Jonah Hill

Actor in a not very good film who deserves the recognition he got: Max von Sydow in “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close”

Actor oddly omitted after praise just about everywhere else: Albert Brooks in “Drive”

Actress I knew wouldn’t get nominated but was still quietly hoping for: Amy Ryan in “Win Win”

Actress who should have been in the mix: Vanessa Redgrave in “Coriolanus”

 

OTHER CATEGORIES

Documentary nominee I’m most looking forward to seeing: “Pina”

Nominated film score that got in the way of the film: John Williams’ “War Horse” score.

Oddly thin category: Only two nominations for Best Original Song

Films that will look the strangest when their DVD boxes says “Academy Award nominated”: “Real Steel” and “Transformers: Dark of the Moon”

 

For a complete list of nominees, click here.  

 

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • See it!
    I thought Midnight in Paris was an unexpected delight. Corey Stoll as Papa Hemingway was terrific, and - I'll out myself as a fan - I found Owen Wilson's character appropriately charming.

    Overall, I was happy to see many more plot-driven nominees this year after many, many years where everything is all about character with very little story to go on. I have six left to see to cover all the top five categories and look forward to this time every year - me spending blustery weekend afternoons in the dark!
  • Win Win--yes!
    Couldn't agree more that Win Win was a standout last year. Could this oversight be a matter of poor timing on when that film was released?
  • Win Win, the Pitts
    Agreed: Win Win is a best picture-level film, and Giamatti gives a fantastic performance.

    My only real surprise: That Brad Pitt was NOT nominated as "Best Actor Trying to Be Robert Redford" in Moneyball, a film that, despite plenty of weakness, I found myself really enjoying.
  • Agree to disagree
    Totally agree that Win Win should have been a Best Picture nominee - both my husband and I said that when we saw it months ago.

    However, could not disagree more with your assessment of War Horse. This is my Best Picture of the year - loved it, and everyone I know who has seen it says the same thing. Also think John Williams' score for the film is one of his best. Listening to the soundtrack in my office right now, as a matter of fact.

    Different strokes....

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Only half a million TV Viewers? And thats an increase? I knew Indycar was struggling but I didn't know it was that bad. Hell, if NASCAR hits 5 Million viewers everyone starts freaking out saying its going down hill. It has a long way to before Indycar even hits NASCAR's bad days.

  2. IU has been talking that line for years with no real progress even with the last Dean, Dr. Brater. Why will an outsider, Dr. Hess, make a difference? With no proof of additional resources (cash in the bank), and a concrete plan to move an academic model that has been outdated for decades with a faculty complacent with tenure and inertia, I can count on IU to remain the same during the tenure of Dr. Hess. One ought to look to Purdue and Notre Dame for change and innovation. It is just too bad that both of those schools do not have their own medical school. Competition might wake up IU. My guess is, that even with those additions to our State, IU will remain in its own little world squandering our State's tax dollars. Why would any donor want to contribute to IU with its track record? What is its strategy to deal with the physician shortage for our State? New leadership will not be enough for us to expect any change.

  3. How do you think the Bridges got approved? I spent a couple days researching PAC's and individual contributions to some city council members during that time. My printouts were inches thick on the two I concentrated on. Finally gave up. Was disgusted with all the donations, and who they were from. Would have taken me days and days to compile a complete list. Tried to give it to the Star reporter, but he thought it was all just fine. (and apparently he was treated well himself) He ended up being laid off or fired though. And then of course, there was land donated to the dad's club, or city, as a partial payoff. All done in the shining example of "charity." No, none of these contributions are a coincidence.

  4. I agree what kind of help or if any will be there for Dr. Ley's patients. I was a patient myself.

  5. What about the hundreds of patients who sought this doctor for the right reasons, to quit drugs. what option do these patients now have, experience horrible withdrawl or return to heroin?? those are the choices. what about the children of these former addicts who's parent(s) WILL not b able to maintain their job, for @ least 2 weeks.. There needs to b an emergency clinic opened for these patients.

ADVERTISEMENT