Oscar noms: Really?

January 24, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Initial thoughts on the Academy Award nominees, announced this morning:

 

BEST PICTURE

Film that made it in because of good intentions: “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close”

Films that made it in by virtue of the stature of their directors: “War Horse” and “Hugo.”

Film I haven’t seen yet: “Midnight in Paris”

Film with the most annoying voiceover crutch: “The Descendants”

Films that were overlooked: “Win Win” and “Coriolanus”

Film I’ll be rooting for as Best Picture: “Tree of Life”

Film I’ll happily settle for as Best Picture: “The Artist”

 

BEST ACTOR/ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE

Actor I’m glad to see in the mix: Demian Bichir

Actor who doesn’t deserve all of the nominations he gets: George Clooney

Actors who deserve it far more than Clooney: Ralph Fiennes in “Coriolanus” and Paul Giamatti in “Win Win”

Actress whose performance really should have been nominated for Best Supporting Actress: Viola Davis

Actresses who should have been in the mix: Tilda Swinton for “We Need to Talk About Kevin” and Elizabeth Olsen for “Martha Marcy May Marlene.”

 

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR/ACTRESS

Actor I’ve never for a second believed on film: Jonah Hill

Actor in a not very good film who deserves the recognition he got: Max von Sydow in “Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close”

Actor oddly omitted after praise just about everywhere else: Albert Brooks in “Drive”

Actress I knew wouldn’t get nominated but was still quietly hoping for: Amy Ryan in “Win Win”

Actress who should have been in the mix: Vanessa Redgrave in “Coriolanus”

 

OTHER CATEGORIES

Documentary nominee I’m most looking forward to seeing: “Pina”

Nominated film score that got in the way of the film: John Williams’ “War Horse” score.

Oddly thin category: Only two nominations for Best Original Song

Films that will look the strangest when their DVD boxes says “Academy Award nominated”: “Real Steel” and “Transformers: Dark of the Moon”

 

For a complete list of nominees, click here.  

 

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • See it!
    I thought Midnight in Paris was an unexpected delight. Corey Stoll as Papa Hemingway was terrific, and - I'll out myself as a fan - I found Owen Wilson's character appropriately charming.

    Overall, I was happy to see many more plot-driven nominees this year after many, many years where everything is all about character with very little story to go on. I have six left to see to cover all the top five categories and look forward to this time every year - me spending blustery weekend afternoons in the dark!
  • Win Win--yes!
    Couldn't agree more that Win Win was a standout last year. Could this oversight be a matter of poor timing on when that film was released?
  • Win Win, the Pitts
    Agreed: Win Win is a best picture-level film, and Giamatti gives a fantastic performance.

    My only real surprise: That Brad Pitt was NOT nominated as "Best Actor Trying to Be Robert Redford" in Moneyball, a film that, despite plenty of weakness, I found myself really enjoying.
  • Agree to disagree
    Totally agree that Win Win should have been a Best Picture nominee - both my husband and I said that when we saw it months ago.

    However, could not disagree more with your assessment of War Horse. This is my Best Picture of the year - loved it, and everyone I know who has seen it says the same thing. Also think John Williams' score for the film is one of his best. Listening to the soundtrack in my office right now, as a matter of fact.

    Different strokes....

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT