IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: No great Shakes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

It shouldn’t come as much of a surprise that, with limited resources, IUPUI’s Hoosier Bard Productions doesn’t make a masterpiece out of the most obscure of Shakespeare’s plays—one that may not even be Shakespeare’s play at all.

To be sure, “The History of Cardenio” is an oddity. And its disputed history is certainly fascinating (Records show that a play by unnamed writers was staged by Shakespeare’s company based on a section of “Don Quixote.” Other records, half a century later, show a play credited to Shakespeare and John Fletcher. Still other references…ah, why don’t you just Google it?)
 

ae-cardenio9318-15col.jpg It’s academic. Scholars are still pondering how much Shakespeare there is in “The History of Cardenio.” (Photo/ Eric Burrous: IUPUI)

For this production, “The History of Cardenio” has been credited as a play “by William Shakespeare and John Fletcher, re-created and reimagined by Gary Taylor.” Would I have enjoyed it more if the program had featured question marks after each of the supposed contributors’ authorship credit? That might have felt more intellectually honest but, ultimately, its history and its sourcing isn’t what was put on IUPUI’s new stage. The play—well, a play—was.

As offered here, “Cardenio” has betrayal, forgiveness, cross-dressing, insanity, a prominent coffin, and parent-approved and parent-disapproved pairings—all the stuff that has been used by Shakespeare in other works. It’s got a cast ranging from stiltedly amateur to full-out ham with occasional moments of truth and beauty. And it’s got a title hero upstaged by the more familiar characters Don Quixote (played with appropriate bombast by Jonah D. Winston) and his sidekick Sancho (a still-in-high-school standout Brandon Merriweather). Not to praise too faintly, but the overall quality of Hoosier Bard’s “Cardenio” is significantly higher than


ae-cardenio9343-15col.jpg Don Bernard (Michael Hosp), far right, interrupts a romantic encounter between his daughter, Lucinda (Maria Souza-Eglen), and the idealistic student, Cardenio (Thomas Cardwell) in IUPUI’s “The History of Cardenio.” (Photo/ Eric Burrous: IUPUI)

it was in the company’s freshman effort, the excruciating 2011 “Young Hamlet.”

As directed by Terri Bourus, “Cardenio” eschews sets, letting costumes and an onstage musical combo do the atmospheric heavy lifting. That, combined with the high-school-auditorium-like design of the new IUPUI Campus Center Theater, accents the overall amateurism of the exercise, although the sizable cast—without doubling of parts—certainly helps keep things understandable.

But should a production by Shakespeare or anyone else be applauded for being reasonably coherent? For getting some laughs (albeit primarily with sex jokes)? Or for existing in the first place?

Ah, there’s the rub.

Lesser-known shows not only offer greater acting and directing challenges, they also are likely to cause nervous breakdowns in the marketing department. On top of that, there’s also a greater risk of artistic failure.

Of course, while I’d gladly give up another “Romeo and Juliet” or “Midsummer Night’s Dream” for a chance to see a solid “Measure for Measure” or “Love’s Labours Lost” on area stages, I understand the conservative thinking of theater producers. Pulling off—and finding audiences for—a competent “As You Like It” is a lot easier than bringing “Troilus and Cressida” to life.

Or “The History of Cardenio.” Whether a guy named Shakespeare wrote any of it or not.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT