Manning drives value of jersey spot

August 11, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
farmbureauAfter watching heavy doses of ESPN SportsCenter this weekend, it’s easy to see why the Indianapolis Colts are one of only a handful of NFL franchises so far to sell an ad on their practice jerseys.

NFL teams were only notified five months ago they would be allowed to sell the practice jersey sponsorship patches—one per team. Other teams will soon follow, but few have a star like Peyton Manning to drive the deal.

On Saturday and Sunday I saw the Colts QB waxing poetic on national TV for minutes on end. And placed prominently on his shoulder was the Indiana Farm Bureau logo. First, the placement of these ads is genius. They’re so high up, there’s no way to take even a super close-up head and shoulders shot and cut the logo out of the screen.

The patch is only allowed to be 3-1/2 inches by 4-1/2 inches, but its placement makes it look much larger and is unmistakably eye-catching.

According to Joyce Julius, an industry leader in rating the value of TV exposure, the kind of exposure Farm Bureau got from this weekend’s ESPN exposure alone is in the high five-figure range.

Once advertisers fully understand the value and nuances of these deals, teams with the very biggest stars will easily get more money than other teams. Much more. That will probably play into future player contract negotiations.

Players have more ability to drive the value of these sponsorships perhaps than any other team deal. If the local and national cameras follow your team’s players, that team’s jersey sponsorship is going to pay off big. And once team’s realize just how much exposure the jersey sponsors are getting, I wonder if a company like Indiana Farm Bureau will be priced right out of the game. Those spots will soon be reserved for the Cokes, McDonald’s and IBMs of the corporate world.

While other elements of Farm Bureau's sponsorship package is multi-year, the practice jersey spot is a one-year deal. Sources close to the team told me Farm Bureau will pay mid-six figures for the deal. I think the Colts soon will realize, as long as Manning is on the roster, they could have commanded much, much more.

To follow The Score on Twitter:
  • After observing these spots in the marketplace for a few weeks, it's easy to see they're undervalued. The teams that waited a few months or even a year, may get more money from these spots during the first round of contracts. In the end, these spots will be on practice jerseys, because its simply too lucrative of a proposition to walk away from.
  • I think they could have commanded more, but why? They are good about partnernships. They understand the value of engaging the community and how that sells tickets, creates fans, and makes them look good. Yeah they could have commanded more, but if they were really looking for that, with Manning, why wouldn't they have just gone for the mooon on the first one. Something a little larger than Indiana Farm Bureau maybe with more of a national or regional prescence could have inked a much larger deal.

    Maybe this is Colts way of saying thank you to the community that is cutting its services and taxing its tourists to allow them to playhere, unlikely, but maybe.
  • No, Mike, I just think they undervalued it. They're not in the business of doing favors.
  • I was just informed by Colts Executive Vice President Pete Ward that the deal with Indiana Farm Bureau for the jersey sponsorhsip patch is a one-year deal. Other parts of the Farm Bureau sponsorship deal are multi-years.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by