Manning: 'It's on like Donkey Kong'

January 16, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
oreoYou may not take the Jan. 18 lick-off between Peyton and Eli Manning and Venus and Serena Williams seriously, but you can bet the folks at Kraft, who own the Oreo brand, are.

This is the second year for the Oreo Double Stuff Racing League challenge. The Manning brothers kicked off this ad campaign last year, and the famous tennis-playing sisters joined in August. This month, the campaign is being billed by Kraft as “The Ultimate Sibling Rivalry.” Commercials featuring the Manning brothers and Williams sisters have aired with increasing frequency during each round of the NFL playoffs. The two sides trade barbs during the commercials, with Peyton quipping, “It’s on like Donkey Kong.”

The challenge will play out during the NFC Championship game this Sunday. Unfortunately for Indianapolis Colts and New York Giants fans, neither of the Manning brothers will be competing on the gridiron. But that makes this commercial series and the accompanying Web site no less attractive for Oreo execs. They’ve reported strong viewer response and record traffic on the Oreo Web site this year. And they’ve added an interactive component.

This time around, consumers can join the competition to see who can twist, lick and dunk (in a glass of milk) an Oreo cookie faster. They can go online and register for a chance for a trip to Florida, where they’ll be coached in the fine art of Oreo licking and dunking by the acknowledged pros. Ten people randomly selected for the trip will also have a shot at competing as part of a “Manning” or “Williams” team for a $10,000 prize to be divvied up among the winning team’s members.

This afternoon, check back with The Score to see how much cash Archie Manning—Peyton and Eli’s dad—is still raking in from his NFL career each year.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT