MARCUS: Kindle depresses elf in Santa's workshop

Morton Marcus
December 19, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

Elvin has been one of Santa’s elves for decades. Normally a jolly fellow, he called me last week with desperation in his voice.

“I can’t go on,” he said.

“What’s the problem?” I asked. “Is Santa making unreasonable demands on the elves this year? I’ve told you to form a union if he refuses to listen to reason. You have rights that need to be respected.”

“No,” he answered. “The old goat is just his usual self. Sitting on his throne, arbitrarily deciding who has been naughty and who has been nice. It’s depressing to see so much power over the happiness of children in his ancient hands. He has no known standards; there are no posted criteria for naughty or nice on his Web site. But, no, he’s not the problem.”

“Tell me about it,” I said in my most supportive voice.

“It’s the Amazon Kindle, the Sony eReader, and all such devices to follow,” Elvin said, sobbing.

“Pull it together, friend,” I said. “What about these machines troubles you?”

“For my entire career with Santa,” Elvin said, “I’ve made toys and other gifts that bring joy, comfort and knowledge to children and adults. It’s been a good life and I could feel good about my elf-self. I was sustaining a great tradition.

“Now, however,” Elvin’s voice cracked with emotion, “there are these devices that are direct attacks on books, newspapers and other printed matter.”

“So what’s new?” I said. “Movies, the phonograph, radio, TV, videotapes, DVDs, the Internet, also were supposed to kill books and newspapers. Yet they survive.”

“This is different,” Elvin insisted. “All those other substitutes for books and newspapers added new dimensions to the printed content. These new devices, however, merely replicate the printed content.”

“No,” I said, trying to disagree without being disagreeable. “What the Kindle and its competitors offer is convenience. Your morning newspaper is delivered in a format where you can control the font size. A young elf may not see the advantage of this, but to this old guy, it sounds fantastic.”

“Yeah,” Elvin snorted, now sounding pugnacious, “but think about the human aspects of this. Thousands of newspaper delivery guys and gals are going to lose their jobs.”

“That’s marvelous,” I said. “Every time we can free people from repetitive, low-paid employment, we make progress for the human race. Your concern for the delivery drivers is similar to the anxiety that folks had when elevator operators were replaced by self-service elevator cars.

“Your sympathies are appropriate. It should be a high priority for our society to expand the skills of workers continuously, not just when they are displaced by improved technology.”

“A wonderful sentiment,” Elvin said, “but where do you see such efforts in our economy? Were Indiana auto or steel workers prepared for job transitions as their industries made massive investments in capital that replaced labor? We act only after the fact, after the damage to the workers, after the loss of jobs, income and self-esteem. Shouldn’t physical capital investments be accompanied by relevant investments in human capital?”

“Elvin,” I said, “this is all wonderful. You’re right on target, but this is the holiday season. If we are indifferent routinely to the consequences of progress, do you imagine we could care during a time of lights and lighthearted living?”

“So,” Elvin sighed, “you do see why I’m depressed.”

“Go have some well-laced eggnog,” I said, knowing my advice was not going to be therapeutic.•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing