MARCUS: Set sights on education, not graduation

Morton Marcus
March 27, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

The dimmer wits in the Indiana General Assembly want to compensate colleges and universities according to their graduation rates. This is another example of shallow reasoning by our elected representatives reflecting erroneous thought that has permeated our society.

As recently as March 2, the Indiana Commission for Higher Education (ICHE) issued a press release in which Commissioner Teresa Lubbers said, “There is nothing more important to Indiana’s higher education agenda than improving college completion rates. While Hoosiers have come to understand the increasing value of going to college, far too many of [sic] college-going students fail to earn a degree.”

Nothing more important than completion rates? What about the substance and significance of what is learned?

In the same news release, Stan Jones, president of Complete College America and Indiana’s former higher education commissioner, said, “Fewer than 40 percent of young adults in Indiana hold an associate’s degree or higher, and the numbers for most states are even worse. For America to be competitive, six of 10 adults between the ages of 25 and 35 will need to hold a postsecondary credential by 2020.”

Complete College America is funded by five prestigious foundations: the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and Lumina Foundation for Education.

It is surprising that such prominent organizations would fall for the correlation between long-term economic growth and years of schooling, which is mislabeled by the Census Bureau as educational attainment. The number of years of school and/or degrees earned is not the same as knowledge acquired.

Pieces of paper, bearing attractive seals and inspiring Latin mottos, represent satisfactory completion of a course of study. Satisfactory to whom? Are degrees from accredited institutions like bonds on Wall Street? Who monitors the accrediting agencies? What criteria do they use? Are they like the esteemed rating agencies that helped drive us into financial crisis by giving AAA designation to junk bonds?

It does not take much imagination to realize that, if graduation rates become the measure for state support, colleges and universities will lower standards to increase those rates.

Standards can be lowered in many ways. Programs or majors can become less demanding with fewer prerequisites and insubstantial core courses. Individual courses can be watered-down, requiring less sophisticated readings, less critical thinking, and lower standards for passing grades.

Has this happened at an institution near you? How would you know?

Certainly the Indiana General Assembly does not know. The indicators ICHE publishes on its Web site do not provide any information on the quality or content of higher education in Indiana. Although there are admirable goals of affordability, accessibility and productivity, there is no goal related to learning. State policy makers measure education attainment in years rather than in knowledge.

At the same time, these advanced policy makers would have us believe there is no value to education that does not lead to a degree or certificate. Yet we would gain much if all young Hoosiers learned freshman English well and mastered the fundamental concepts of American history at the college level. Then let them drop out if they wish or must. That would be better than having 100 percent of those accepted to college pass weak programs in all subjects to satisfy some artificial numeric goal.

But what can you expect? Employers want certificates or degrees because they recognize that those pieces of paper signify endurance. They want employees who have proven they can tolerate anything for an appropriate reward. Is that the lesson we want our students to learn?•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  2. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  3. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  4. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!

  5. You guys are being really rude to gays in the comments. (Not all of you, I presume). You need to stop it. Gays have just as much of a right to marry as straight people do. It's not fair how you guys are denying them equal rights. They're acting more human than you'll ever be. We obviously haven't matured since the bible was last updated. Hate the sin, not the sinner. You've all committed a sin at least once in your life. You've lied, you've stolen, etc. (Those are just possibilities). We should have a planet for people that support gay rights and a planet for people that don't. Then, gay people could get married without you bigots interfering with their love life. How would you feel if straights couldn't get married? How would you feel if teenagers were afraid to come out to their parents as straight? If straight people got hate everywhere they went? If straight people were afraid to go out in public, because they feared being judged? It's never going to happen at the rate society is going. You haven't seen the side of me where I act obscene. You're glad my inner demon hasn't been released. I would, but oh no, my comment would be removed because of my very strong emotions about this subject. I love gays, and love how they show their affection for each other. I just ADORE how a state is going to give same-sex couples a marriage license, then changes their mind. (I was obviously being sarcastic there). I just LOVE how society thinks gays are an abomination to our society. You're caring about marriage between two men or two women. That's a small thing. Just grow up, and let them marry. Let them live their lives. You can't make them change their sexuality. You can't make them change their lifestyle. In my opinion, gays are more than welcome to marry. Please, grow up and realize that people should be allowed to marry, even if it's same-sex marriage. You guys are saying that "the bible said gay marriage is wrong." Well, guess what else is wrong? Read Matthew:7 and you'll find out. (I am in no way breaking that. I am saying a fact). I'm stating that gays have just as much of a right to marry as straights do. (: