Marketers teach biz of school sports

April 23, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
raycomptonThe looming property tax crisis has Indiana high schools fearful that athletic department budgets could be the focus of future fiscal cuts.

Ray Compton, one central Indiana’s most successful—and unconventional—sports marketers has a plan to help. Compton’s company, Compton Strategies, in partnership with several Indiana sports marketing professionals, have come together to offer the first Indiana High School Sports/Music Marketing and Sponsorship Seminar tomorrow at the Forum Conference Center in Fishers. Compton thinks music programs and school bands also have much to be concerned about.

Compton’s plan is to give high school officials the tools they need to market their programs to generate more of the revenue they need to continue—and rely less on unpredictable income from property taxes.

“Our goal is to use the experiences and insights that we have collected over the years to provide guidance, leadership and assistance to the high school industry,” said Compton, who formerly worked in marketing for the Indianapolis Colts, Indiana Pacers and Indianapolis Ice. “It is important to all of us that our state’s high schools continue to provide first-class activities in sports and music for their students. We believe there are ways that they can help solve some of the financial challenges that they may face in the immediate future. Our goal is to help uncover those avenues for them.”

Presenters include:
· Judy Shoemaker, National Federation of State High School Associations
· Bob Bernard, Strategic Marketing Alliance
· Larry Konfirst, Konfirst Consulting
· Frank Hancock, Sport Graphics
· Chris Kaufman, Indiana High School Athletic Association
· David Cranfill, Three-sixty Group
· Cal Kuphall, long-time college athletic administrator
· Vic Ruthig and Rita DeKlyen, Compton Strategies
· State Rep. Mike Murphy

Topics of presentations will range from turning games into fun events for fans and sponsors, developing Internet and email strategies to expand fundraising and sponsorships and exploring new methods to increase merchandise sales through licensing.

The seminar runs from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. and tickets are $90.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • This seems like a solid idea. But the $90 seems a bit stiff. How are schools hurting for money supposed to be able to afford that.
  • It seems they should keep the cost down on this first year introductory offer until they can establish an ROI on this seminar. But it is a unique offering, so who knows, maybe the demand will be great.
  • This makes a lot of sense to me. This property tax situation has a lot of school programs in real trouble.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT