Marty's party over in IRL

October 21, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
martyIt’s official, kind of. Marty’s party in the Indy Racing League is over. Sources have told IBJ that IRL officials have asked driver and team owner Marty Roth (through intermediaries) to explore other options for the 2009 season—that don’t include him piloting a car full-time in the open-wheel series.

IRL officials have told Roth he could attempt to qualify at Indianapolis and for a limited number of other oval races next year, but he would not be given an unrestricted IRL license to run in all the events next year. Roth, who funds his own team, has put a for sale sign on all his racing equipment. The Canadian was a regular on the IRL circuit this year, but seldom got anywhere near the front of the pack.

For a more detailed account of Roth’s situation, go here.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Berwick guy's gonna be upset.

    This is good for the league/series. Safety should be their number one concern. Its obvious they can enjoy (their definition of the term) success with very little fan base. No worries there; they can grow the thing through Vs.

    :lol:
  • If the IRL is showing Roth the door, who's next? Milka isn't exactly burning up the track. Some would even say she's a hazzard. But maybe she's a bit too popular with certain demographics to give her the boot. Or maybe her sponsor has too much clout. So is this truly for safety's sake? Or are there business agendas at play as well when these decisions are made?
  • Marty, take a seat next to former IRL driver Dr. Jack. Miller. You can't race an Amish buggy on a go cart track.

    If Marty was smart, he would have left John Andretti in the drivers seat. John was able to get speed out of the equipment that you couldn't. Maybe you should try the Indy Lights series, maybe you could stay on the lead lap for at least 20 laps!

    Where's Lloyd Ruby when you need him?
  • I am assuming since marty was a fourriner (Canadienne) he was asked to make room for some good god fearing American Drivers (OK'd by Paffy or Howie) so this is right what the League needs, right?

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT