IBJNews

Medicare Advantage may survive cuts under health reform

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Medicare Advantage plans, private insurance for the elderly, may survive losing $136 billion in government subsidies under President Barack Obama’s health-care law.

The two largest U.S. health insurance companies, UnitedHealth, based in Minnetonka, Minn., and WellPoint Inc., based in Indianapolis, sell Advantage plans. Smaller rivals offering the coverage include Humana Inc., based in Louisville.

WellPoint has about 2.3 million Medicare customers, according to analyst estimates. That’s less than 7 percent of the company's 34 million total customers, but the insurer had been hoping to boost those numbers significantly.

Stephen J. Hemsley, CEO of UnitedHealth Group Inc., told analysts on an earnings call last week that reduced payments won’t keep the company’s products from competing with Medicare insurance offered directly from the government. Kathleen Sebelius, the Health and Human Services secretary, told a House Appropriations subcommittee that she expects “a robust array of choices for Medicare recipients.”

Hemsley was outlining a strategy to investors and analysts while Sebelius was fending off Republican attacks on the overhaul legislation and soothing the elderly. A survey this month by the Kaiser Family Foundation, a philanthropy that studies health-care issues, found that 45 percent of people 65 and older are “angry” about the legislation.

“Sebelius is right” about Medicare Advantage, said Elizabeth A. McGlynn, associate director of Rand Health at the Rand Corp., a research institute in Santa Monica, Calif. “We’re going to see a variety of responses from plans. We may see plans that choose to go out of the business, and I think we’ll see plans that get very creative in how they choose to position themselves.”

Insurers offering the plans could pressure health providers to lower their prices, McGlynn said. Also, Senate Democrats and the White House “did some smart things” to mitigate the effect of the Advantage cuts in the final version of the health law, said Robert A. Berenson, a former Medicare official now at the Urban Institute, a research foundation in Washington, D.C.

The law lets Advantage plans operating in areas where Medicare’s costs are lower than private insurers’ costs be paid more than the government program, said Berenson, who served in the Clinton administration. Plans where Medicare’s costs are higher than private insurers’ costs would get less.

Beginning in 2014, Advantage plans can earn 5-percent bonus payments if they implement programs to improve the health of their customers or the efficiency of care, he said. Insurers could qualify if they created programs to manage chronic diseases, for example, or new payment systems for doctors.

“To the extent some plans can’t make it, they probably don’t deserve to make it,” Berenson said. “This is competition, I think. There should be plenty of room for good plans.”

About 11 million elderly, or 24 percent of all beneficiaries, used Medicare Advantage plans, according to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission a panel that analyzes the program for Congress and makes recommendations.

The health legislation would cut payments to the Advantage plans by about $136 billion over the next 10 years, the Congressional Budget Office says. The reduction is necessary to help pay for the law’s expansion of health insurance coverage to about 32 million people younger than 65 who would otherwise lack it. The budget office says the law will cost about $940 billion over the next decade.

Obama and congressional Democrats targeted the private plans for reductions early in the health debate, arguing that the programs received excessive payments. That sparked a fight with insurers and gave Republicans a way to target elderly voters. The present form of Advantage plans arose from 2003 legislation under President George W. Bush.

While the Advantage cuts in the final law aren’t as deep as earlier proposals, the industry’s trade group says the reductions will hurt.

“These very severe cuts will inevitably cause disruption for seniors, and particularly for seniors who count on health plans’ value-added services that emphasize prevention and wellness, coordination of care, and better management of chronic conditions,” said Mike Tuffin, a spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, the trade association, in an e-mailed statement.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, in a March 19 analysis of the health-care legislation, did estimate that enrollment in the private plans would drop to about 9.1 million by 2019, a 17-percent reduction from now. Medicare’s chief actuary, Richard S. Foster, estimated a drop to 7.4 million.

“This bill takes health-care benefits away from seniors who are on Medicare Advantage,” Senator Jon Kyl, Republican of Arizona, said in a floor speech March 24. “That is the truth.”

The 45 percent of elderly in the Kaiser poll found to be “angry” over the law compares with 26 percent of people younger than 65. Less than a third, 32 percent, of the elderly had a favorable opinion of the law, compared with 49 percent in the younger group. The telephone survey was conducted April 9-14. The data on the elderly were taken from a larger survey that had a margin of error of 3 percentage points.

People enrolled in the private plans have their benefits paid for by a private insurer, instead of by the government. Many of the plans offer lower co-payments and greater benefits than the government program, according to Medicare’s administrators. That may include gym memberships and discounts on hearing aids and eyeglasses. Some are managed-care plans that limit their customers’ selection of doctors and hospitals.

The government pays the plans a fee for each customer. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission estimates that Medicare Advantage plans will be paid about 9 percent more for each beneficiary in 2010 than traditional Medicare’s costs.

Advantage plans contributed to a 21-percent increase in first-quarter net income at UnitedHealth, the company reported April 20. The number of Advantage policies the company wrote rose 18 percent, offsetting a decline in commercial policies.

“We have said for some time now that our Medicare Advantage business must ultimately be able to perform better than fee-for-service Medicare on a comparable-benefits basis and with care quality considered,” Hemsley said on a conference call the day earnings were reported. “We believe we can achieve and sustain that standard in the majority of our local markets.”

The company also sees opportunities to sell products through AARP, the lobbying group for people 50 and older, he said. The group receives royalties from UnitedHealth in exchange for the company’s use of the AARP brand on Medicare Advantage and Medicare supplemental plans.

The Obama administration also has an alliance with the AARP, which endorsed the health-care revamp. Congressional Republicans, in a letter to Hemsley this week, asked for details on the insurer’s relationship with AARP.

Sebelius’ department held an online chat this week with government officials and AARP president Jennie Chin Hansen. One person who submitted a question for the chat asked about a rumor that Medicare Advantage would disappear by 2014.

“That is simply not true,” replied Jonathan Blum, director of the Center for Medicare Management, a Medicare agency.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • medicare
    So good to hear some talk abiout the way the government is screwing up the health care system and trying to destroy medicare advantage ppo's
  • Incompetent
    How can a law be passed based on a non read of all the language.The politicians and judges should be ashamed of themselves. I guess its nice to live in plain ignorance of how the rest of the people live.Are the law makers going to play by the same rules. If not lets make sure we kick them out.
  • At the trough
    You want me to pay for your care!
  • Medicare Advantage Better Than Original Medicare
    My affordable Medicare Advantage Plan includes prescription drugs. I don't want to have to go to the COSTLY Original Medicare! You have to have an expensive supplement PLUS a separate nad costly Part D for drugs. This crazy Part D doesn't "kick-in" till you've paid $325 out of pocket. What a racquet! Am totally disgusted with this present administration. I don't want my health benefits "redistributed". We've worked hard all our lives to save $. Now it's gonna' be taken away from seniors & blown away.
    • GONE!!
      Medicare advantage companies will disappear
      eventually and everyone will be under medicare.
    • Medicare Advantage
      I do not want Medicare Advantage to disappear, but I do want the subsidy (currently 14%) to disappear. I do not understand why taxpayers should pay 14% more for people who opt for Medicare Advantage than they do for people who opt for regular Medicare. If people want the Medicare Advantage extras, they should pay for them themselves.
    • Medicare Advantage Plans
      It will be interesting to see if Medicare Advantage plans can compete with the more traditional Medicare Supplemental Insurance. Once the cuts are fully implemented insures will have to make up for about $80-$100 a month in premiums and benefits. It going to make premiums for the two in the same ballpark, and I can't see how Medicare Advantage competes with no network, and no co-pays that Medicare supplement can offer. It's a shame because Medicare Advantage has not been fully debated and seniors seem to be the only one to cede.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT