IBJNews

Menard's fight with Hilberts to surface in trial with Trump

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A skirmish in the ongoing legal war between hardware store magnate John Menard and former business partner Stephen Hilbert will surface in open court on Tuesday, as a trial begins between one of Menard's companies and former model Melania Trump.

The federal bench trial in Indianapolis is expected to last three days, and include testimony from Trump, the wife of real estate investor Donald Trump.

Hilbert, the former CEO of Carmel-based Conseco Inc. and longtime friend of Menard, was CEO of a private equity firm founded in 2005 that was funded by Menard. Its holdings included New Sunshine LLC, a skin-care products company.

Menard’s lawsuit alleges that he sent a letter to Hilbert in June 2012 removing him as CEO, but that Hilbert refused to leave and continued to make unauthorized business decisions for New Sunshine. Big moves by New Sunshine during that period included a five-year licensing deal for products developed by Melania Trump.

In February, Menard won a court battle with Hilbert that allowed him to regain control of New Sunshine. Soon thereafter, New Sunshine sent a letter to Trump canceling a promotional deal for the launch of her skin-care products. Trump filed a lawsuit with an arbitrator, claiming New Sunshine’s actions had resulted in $50 million in damages.

Melania Trump had been scheduled to promote the product line on an April 7 appearance on Donald Trump’s TV show “The Apprentice,” as well as on “The Today Show” and “The View” in the following days. The canceled contract meant she did not have any product samples to help her promotion, her lawsuit stated.

But Menard claims that because New Sunshine entered into the contract with Melania Trump’s company, Melania Marks Skincare LLC, while Stephen Hilbert still managed New Sunshine, the contract was void.

In a brief filed with the court, Melania Trump’s firm counters that the agreement was valid because New Sunshine’s president at the time, Eric Weber, had the authority to sign the agreement.

Menard, Hilbert, and Hilbert’s wife, Tomisue, are entangled on other legal fronts. IBJ broke the story in March that the billionaire hardware king had ousted Steve Hilbert as CEO of his private equity fund.

The Hilberts fired back in June with a lawsuit alleging Menard ditched Steve Hilbert as retribution after Tomisue spurned his repeated sexual advances. The suit said Menard told Tomisue that “no one tells me no” and that if he “did not get sexually what I want, there will be financial consequences.”

Menard has countersued Tomisue Hilbert for “abuse of process,” saying she filed her lawsuit only after companies controlled by Menard removed the Hilberts as managers and sued to recover millions of dollars in fees paid to the Hilberts.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Tacky, tacky
    This episode of "Tacky Lives of the Cheesy Rich" is off the meter.
  • Deserving
    Love it! This is a group of people that deserve each other.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT