Merits, demerits of adjunct profs

June 19, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Ivy Tech Community College canâ??t hire adjunct faculty fast enough to teach its ballooning number of students.

The system is scouring locales where its campuses are located for people with masterâ??s degrees who could teach part time: The going rate: $2,200 per course.

The upside to adjuncts is their current, real-world experience. Thatâ??s particularly valuable for students who have to hit the job market with skills demanded by employers.

The downside is they seldom have the highest degrees available in their fields, which limits their expertise.

What has been your experience with adjuncts? Do you prefer adjuncts or full-time professors?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Having taught as an adjunct many years ago, I have to say that the assumption that adjunct faculty's expertise is limited is untrue. There are many PhD's teaching as adjuncts because they are unable to find full-time teaching positions. The upside for the universities is that adunct faculty is part-time and typically receive no fringe benefits, especially health insurance. If Ivy Tech is having a problem finding enough faculty to teach its courses, perhaps they ought to consider hiring full-time faculty. I know I couldn't be lured by a measly $2,200 per course. The universities are making out like bandits as long as they continue to use adjuncts and refuse to hire full-time faculty as they ought to.
  • As someone who has taught as an adjunct and is pursing a doctorate, I agree that there is a misperception that all adjuncts are created equal. Sure, some adjuncts may lack the conceptual framework to back up their practical experience. At the same time, some full time faculty lack the current practical experience to be able to translate theory to implementation. Universities are a business, and as long as the labor market will work for $2,200 a class, that's the price the university will pay--straight from introduction to economics.

    Ivy Tech cannot hire full time faculty due to the Indiana budget, which allocates funds differently for full time or adjunct. If you want to fix the problem, call you state reps but just remember, there's only one pot of money and it all comes from the taxpayer as tuition at Ivy Tech does not carry the full cost of running the organization.
  • I have a graduate degree. I am sorry to say my time is worth more than $2,200 per course. Most are sixteen weeks in duration. That equals less than $150 per week. Deduct tax, and expenses such as gas, and they will be fortunate to net $100 per week. Good luck recruiting with that pay scale.
  • While I agree that some may actually have better real-world experience that could translate into better teaching, I have found from my courses taught by adjunct professors at IUPUI that these professors typically (not always) lack the actual teaching traits... yeah, some may be smart, and some may be good teachers, but my experience is that I'd rather be sleeping, on my blackberry, or even at home reading the dang book by myself than listening to someone stumble and ramble trying to make the class understand...
  • As others have said, I have worked as an adjunct and quit. The expectations of time and quality to prepare for and teach the class is the same as the university requires of its full-time faculty, yet the pay stinks, there are no benefits, the status is lower than low, and there is no space allotted on campus to meet with students privately when they need help. About the only advantage adjuncts have is the freedom from required university committees and the lack of the expectation to publish and bring in grant money. If I could get a full-time faculty job I would gladly serve on committees, publish and write grant applications; alas, that ship sailed long ago.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT