IBJNews

Moody's: Established gambling markets faltering

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Established gambling towns like Las Vegas and Atlantic City are hurting as more states start welcoming bettors' dollars, Moody's Investors Service warned this week.

The credit rating agency issued a report describing a shift in casino tax revenue away from New Jersey, Indiana and Nevada to new markets in places like Pennsylvania, Illinois and Ohio.

The recession crushed gambling revenue across the county, and casino towns have been slow to bounce back.

"The previously recession-proof Nevada gaming market has seen only a partial recovery since the recession," the report stated.

In Atlantic City, where the national recession exacerbated an existing drop in visitors, gambling tax revenue has declined every year since 2006. Mississippi, home to riverboat casinos, has seen a 7.7-percent decline in gambling tax revenue over the last 10 years.

While casino taxes make up less than 1 percent of New Jersey's revenue, they account for a quarter of Nevada's general fund.

Meanwhile, struggling states have opened the doors to games of chance. Among those that have expanded legalized gambling in recent years are Pennsylvania, New York, Maryland, West Virginia and Delaware.

All this is more bad news for states that previously enjoyed casino monopolies.

Pennsylvania, which has a casino market a quarter the size of Nevada's, now collects more gambling taxes than any other state. The state took in $1.5 billion in such revenue last year.

Moody's predicts these trends will continue as more states harness gambling as a new source of revenue. The result could be a redrawing of the market share and tax revenue landscape.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Forward Thinking
    Shocking news from our friends at Moody's. What industry is next, let me guess, companies that sell typewriters are going to face competition from home computers and printers. As soon as states approved casino gambling they should have seen this coming. For Ohio, that was like 3 years ago. Moody's and others are well behind, just like when they missed the housing bubble. Oh yeah, they get paid by the very industries they cover. Conflict of interest? Perhaps.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Only half a million TV Viewers? And thats an increase? I knew Indycar was struggling but I didn't know it was that bad. Hell, if NASCAR hits 5 Million viewers everyone starts freaking out saying its going down hill. It has a long way to before Indycar even hits NASCAR's bad days.

  2. IU has been talking that line for years with no real progress even with the last Dean, Dr. Brater. Why will an outsider, Dr. Hess, make a difference? With no proof of additional resources (cash in the bank), and a concrete plan to move an academic model that has been outdated for decades with a faculty complacent with tenure and inertia, I can count on IU to remain the same during the tenure of Dr. Hess. One ought to look to Purdue and Notre Dame for change and innovation. It is just too bad that both of those schools do not have their own medical school. Competition might wake up IU. My guess is, that even with those additions to our State, IU will remain in its own little world squandering our State's tax dollars. Why would any donor want to contribute to IU with its track record? What is its strategy to deal with the physician shortage for our State? New leadership will not be enough for us to expect any change.

  3. How do you think the Bridges got approved? I spent a couple days researching PAC's and individual contributions to some city council members during that time. My printouts were inches thick on the two I concentrated on. Finally gave up. Was disgusted with all the donations, and who they were from. Would have taken me days and days to compile a complete list. Tried to give it to the Star reporter, but he thought it was all just fine. (and apparently he was treated well himself) He ended up being laid off or fired though. And then of course, there was land donated to the dad's club, or city, as a partial payoff. All done in the shining example of "charity." No, none of these contributions are a coincidence.

  4. I agree what kind of help or if any will be there for Dr. Ley's patients. I was a patient myself.

  5. What about the hundreds of patients who sought this doctor for the right reasons, to quit drugs. what option do these patients now have, experience horrible withdrawl or return to heroin?? those are the choices. what about the children of these former addicts who's parent(s) WILL not b able to maintain their job, for @ least 2 weeks.. There needs to b an emergency clinic opened for these patients.

ADVERTISEMENT