Motorsports marketer assists NBA

January 30, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
royalThe National Basketball Association got an assist from an Indianapolis sponsorship consultancy, who oddly, works solely in the motorsports realm.

NBA officials recently decided to loosen its rules on hard liquor sponsorships, to allow teams to let those companies advertise courtside, during NBA TV broadcasts and on team Web sites. Locally based Just Marketing International four years ago successfully lobbied to get its hard liquor clients—such as Crown Royal—into NASCAR.

Other sports leagues were obviously paying attention when Brown argued that hard liquor makers are some of the most contentious when it comes to educating the public about responsible drinking. Not too long after JMI helped usher hard liquor sponsors into NASCAR, the National Hockey League and Major League Baseball loosened their regulations on hard liquor advertising and sponsorships.

Those leagues also no doubt paid attention to the $75 million to $100 million hard liquor companies spend annually in NASCAR.

The faltering economy no doubt was another impetus to the NBA’s move, which sports business experts said could bring the league’s teams a strong six-figure amount each annually. Sources close to the NBA said a league-wide hard liquor sponsorship also is in the works.

Not everyone is a fan of JMI’s pioneering work or the NBA’s recent decision, with pointed criticism coming from the American Medical Association and the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

“Spirits marketers are very responsible,” said JMI founder and CEO Zak Brown. “They are used to being held to a higher level of scrutiny than others. So now, all the other leagues are seeing the opportunity and taking note that these are great marketers who spend a lot of money.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT