Art museum trimming reliance on endowment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Museum of Art is relying less on its endowment to fund operations, IMA officials announced this week.

In its proposed budget for fiscal year 2014-15, which begins July 1, the museum will draw just 5.99 percent of the endowment for operations, CEO Charles Venable said Tuesday night at IMA's annual meeting. That's down from nearly 8 percent in recent years and 6.6 percent in the current fiscal period.

Venable set a goal of cutting the annual draw to 5 percent when he took over the job in late 2012. Ideally, he'd like to see it fall to 4 percent.

As of Feb. 28, 2014, (the most recent available figures), the endowment stood at $354 million, up from $340 million in June 2013 and as low as $266 million in the recession.

IMA set a $28.1 million operating budget for 2014-15, up slightly from $28 million in 2013-14. Just over $20 million of the museum's expected expenses in 2014-15 will be paid for with the endowment, down from $20.4 million in 2013-14.

The financial news comes after a tumultuous 2013 in which Venable presided over an 11-percent staff reduction, including 19 full-timers, to cut costs and lessen IMA’s reliance on its endowment.

In the wake of the layoffs, key staffers including Lisa Freiman, senior curator and chair of the contemporary art department, left for positions elsewhere. The St. Louis Museum of Art’s Tricia Paik, Freiman’s replacement, joins the IMA in August.

Matt Gutwein, treasurer and chairman of the finance committee, praised Venable’s “laser-like focus on fiscal discipline” in reducing reliance on the endowment.

Refinancing debt, plus $1.6 million generated from the IMA’s high-profile Matisse show, helped lower the percent as did decreased expenses, Gutwein said.

At the meeting, Venable touted the IMA’s 10,473 membership figure (its highest since 2008), its attendance of nearly 400,000 visitors (a number matching the previous year's and does not include visitors to the IMA's art and nature park), and the museum’s loans of work from its permanent collection to institutions in Brussels, Seoul, Tokyo, Edinburgh and Paris among many others. Such loans increase a museum's prestige internationally.

Also announced at the annual meeting was the continuing of a relationship with the Clowes Fund that will lead to 12 more gifts of Old Masters paintings to the permanent collection, including a work by Hieronymus Bosch.
Upcoming major exhibits include a show on Neo-Impressionist Portraits opening in June and a celebration of the work of Georgia O’Keefe and other southwestern still-life artists opening in November.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1