NASCAR sponsors eyeing IRL

July 18, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Subway restaurants won’t be the last NASCAR sponsor racing to the Indy Racing League, according to motorsports marketing experts.

An idea that seemed laughable a year or two ago is now reality. Subway, a big-time NASCAR sponsor, this week announced it would sponsor an IRL car driven by Paul Tracy. The deal, league insiders said, was brokered by IRL boss Tony George to let Subway take a test drive in the IRL. League sources said Subway is thinking hard about becoming a bigger sponsor in IRL next year. They added that Subway is one of five finalists to become the league’s title sponsor. For more on that, come back to this blog on Monday.

Sure, the Subway-Paul Tracy agreement is a one-off deal. And Subway isn’t paying more than a couple lunch meat sandwiches to put its name and logo on the car for the upcoming race in Edmonton. But it’s a sign of things to come.

“There are a lot of NASCAR sponsors who are suddenly taking a hard look at the numbers,” said Larry DeGaris, a sports marketing professor at the University of Indianapolis. “It’s no joke. Sponsorship in NASCAR has gotten so expensive, it has a lot of sponsors there crunching the numbers and looking at alternative ways to get their messages out. And they realize the cost per million in the IRL is looking much better.”

Zak Brown, president of locally based Just Marketing International, has also heard from NASCAR sponsors looking at the IRL. He should know. Brown, who counts Subway as one of his clients, got rich in the last decade matching corporate entities with NASCAR teams. A little more than a year ago, he was hired by the IRL to help sell its title sponsorship.

Brown claims it’s not necessarily an either/or proposition.

“The demographics of the two series are different,” Brown said. “For many companies, they’re complimentary. But one thing’s for certain. The momentum of the IndyCar series has sponsors’ attention.”
  • Here's the thing: there are too many cars in Nascar's Sprint Cup series for second-tier sponsors to be comfortable there. While there is this year a focus on the third-tier teams (go-or-go-homers), those sponsors aren't necessarily getting their money's worth either. The sponsors for the middle third, from about 15th to 30th, can't be happy with their levels of exposure. Their cars don't run up front, and they don't fail to make the field, and they don't wreck or cause wrecks like the real backmarkers.

    I'd watch for enough sponsorship (in the aggregate) to leave Sprint Cup for IRL to stabilize the regular Cup car count between 38 and 43. The economics simply dictate that.
  • An idea that seemed laughable a year or two ago is now reality.

    No. It's still laughable. The 'league' title sponsorship couldn't fund a start & park in Nascar.

    Cheerlead all you want, no one is interested, and the main reason is the foul cancer that is Tony H. George.

    Or just ask Pep Boys, Northern Light, Rachels etc.

    Still waiting for those finals, Anthony.

    Serious question - what is it in the Indiana mindset that makes everyone defer to those with money? That's a disturbing, un-American, creepy way to live.

    And the 'league' has yet to un-suck itself, and never will.
  • Stan,

    While you may not be an ICS fan, there are lots of us out here. Some of us choose not to follow the herd that is NASCAR, and many of us fit a different demographic alltogether. Go flame somewhere else.
  • stan is just one of the few die hard c>rt/ccws/owrs fans who refuse to believe their series sucked. They had no real business plan and it failed repeatedly. Stan, it is gone, bury your US 500 pennant and move on.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

  2. has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

  3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

  4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

  5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.