IBJNews

NCAA getting out of jersey-selling business

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The NCAA is getting out of the memorabilia business.

NCAA President Mark Emmert said Thursday it would stop the practice immediately after reports this week that team jerseys and other items linked to individual schools could be found on its own website by searching for specific player names.

‘‘I think seeing the NCAA sell those kinds of goods is a mistake,’’ Emmert said during a conference call with reporters. ‘‘It’s not what the NCAA is about. So we’re not going to be doing that any longer.’’

The Indianapolis-based NCAA is being sued by former players and a handful of current college players in federal court over the use of athlete images and likenesses. And just this past week, ESPN reported that the NCAA is investigating Heisman Trophy-winner Johnny Manziel for allegedly being paid to sign memorabilia, which if true could jeopardize eligibility as a violation of NCAA amateurism rules.

Emmert said the commercial site won’t be completely removed because there is still a market for generic NCAA apparel. He said the NCAA had hired another company to run the site, ShopNCAASports.com.

Mark Lewis, the NCAA’s executive vice president for championships and alliances, also released a statement, saying university merchandise would not be offered, either.

‘‘In the coming days, the store’s website will be shut down temporarily and reopen in a few weeks as a marketplace for NCAA championship merchandise only,’’ Lewis said. ‘‘After becoming aware of issues with the site, we determined the core function of the NCAA.com fan shop should not be to offer merchandise licensed by our member schools.’’

The move overshadowed a news conference that was intended to update reporters about possible changes to the NCAA’s governance structure. Members of the board of directors and executive had a preliminary discussion on potential changes, though no vote is expected until next August.

Instead, the hot topics became Manziel, NCAA rules and the website fiasco.

Board chairman Nathan Hatch was asked whether some of the NCAA rules regarding payments to college athletes should be modified.

‘‘I stand by the NCAA’s commitment to amateurism, and I believe the way we've done that is the correct way,’’ the Wake Forest president said. ‘‘So I believe the rules we have, we agree with.’’

The NCAA’s new enforcement chief, Jonathan Duncan, later told The Associated Press he does not anticipate modifications to those rules, either.

‘‘Based on my experience before coming to the national office, I know that lots of member groups, cabinets and committees have looked over the years and that lots of changes have been proposed and have not been approved,’’ he said. ‘‘It’s up to the membership and if they change the rules, the enforcement staff will follow their lead.’’

And, of course, back to more memorabilia questions. ‘‘We’re exiting it as soon as we feasibly can,’’ Emmert said. ‘‘Again, I think it was inappropriate for us to be in that business, and we won’t be in the future.’’

ADVERTISEMENT

  • NCAA is corrupt
    The NCAA makes billions on the backs of college athletes and university sports programs. Selling memorabilia was great until the lawsuits started to roll in, now the NCAA has found political religion. I hope that every lawsuit is a victory for the plaintiffs.
  • Why does NCAA exist?
    Mark, can you please justify your existence to me?
  • Hot Water
    Mark shouldn't you also be returning the money you've already made off the jerseys back to the schools?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

    2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

    3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

    4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

    5. Oh wait. Never mind.

    ADVERTISEMENT