Nearly free money on the way?

December 15, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
The Federal Reserve this week is expected to drop the rate at which banks loan money to each other below 1 percent. That means interest rates on loans for just about everything, from cars to housing, eventually would fall further.

The interest youâ??d pay on a loan would be several percentage points higher than the so-called federal funds rate. But the trend is down, and that means the getting may be as good as itâ??s been in a long time.

If youâ??ve been holding back on a purchase, how much further would rates need to drop before youâ??d pull the trigger? Or are you so worried about the economy, your job or your business that even a â??freeâ?? loan wouldnâ??t draw you into the market?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Is it me or do you think credit cards from department stores and gas stations are charging too much interest? (Up to 24.99%)
    If they would come down I would buy more.
  • It's not you. The isssuers would argue that I'm wrong- but I surmise that if you capped credit card interest at 10%, consumer spending would rise and debt would fall. Assuming somebody has $10k on a card, that's anywhere from $500 - $1500 extra in their pocket depending on what rate they have. I'm normally not a person who cries that's not fair!, but credit card issuers have charged usury rates for way too long.
  • Anyone who uses their credit card as a loan deserves to pay those high rates.
  • Even if you try to prove your self-worth with good to excellent credit, they still distrust you with a lower interest. I say, we need to grab our pitch forks and torches and storm these Credit places. Take action now.

    I understand that everyone needs to make a profit, but 25% markup is crazy. Of course, if people knew the markup of varios retail products, they would think twice about buying from the middleman. For Example, a Hard Drive attachment for XBox 360 (when it came out) costs the end user $100 (suggested retail price). Whole Sale price is $33. That is roughly 300% markup. These retail stores have agreed to carry it for atleast $100 if not more to make a profit on it.

    If you put this on your credit card, and not pay it off right away, Credit Cards dip into your pocket as well as retail stores. Granted, There are alot of expenses that are unforseen, but where do we draw the line? Do we get the privlage to have all companies have open (accounting) books for review? Shall we Micromanage companies? To what extent? I am not deffending Retail Stores or Credit Card companies, but when do we draw the line? How do we draw the line without knoledge of what expenses are being paid? I want to call UnFail Practices on credit card companies, but how can we do that without (partial to complete) open books to regulate profits?

    Governmet stepping in to regulate, yet also call for small government. Where to draw the lines? What is politically correct? It is a moving target and a sticky situation. We want to make the most money but spend the least.
  • The best and only way to get back at the credit card companies is to not use them. The old saying, if you cant buy it with cash you cant afford it, is true. If you need to wait a month to get something then wait for crying out loud. If you need to use your credit card to pay a utility bill or food for family, get a part time job. It is such a simple fix, but most people clearly do not use the brain in their skull. I owe nobody, minus a mortgage, but no credit card debt at all and no car payment. I can not tell you how good it feels to have all the extra money in MY pocket and not theirs.
  • I just wish lawmakers would define USURY rates. All interests needs to be X amount or under.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT