IBJNews

Need for Duke coal-gas plant on regulators' agenda

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Energy Corp. says it needs a new coal-gasification power plant it's building in southwest Indiana to meet growing demand as it retires older plants, but consumer advocates don't believe it.

The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission will take up the issue Wednesday, in the shadow of an ethics scandal over decisions involving the plant that led to the firing of the commission chairman. As IBJ reported Oct. 15, Duke CEO James E. Rogers is expected to appear before the panel.

According to regulatory filings, more than 1,500 workers are building the plant at Edwardsport, which is about 70-percent complete. The price tag that's been factored into the utility's rates has grown to nearly $3 billion — or about twice the project's original 2007 estimate.

Charlotte, N.C.-based Duke argues it's money well spent.

Duke said its Indiana coal-fired power plants are 47 years old on average, and it hasn't built a major new plant here in three decades. Duke projects it will need up to 438 megawatts by 2013 as it retires those older plants.

"The need is clearly there, based on the age of our overall fleet and from the electric energy needs of our customers," said Doug Esamann, interim president of Duke's Indiana operations.

But the State Utility Forecasting Group at Purdue University said in January that the recession and more efficient appliances were expected to lower overall demand.

Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana said the nation has an adequate supply of electrical power, due in part to increases in energy efficiency and supplies of alternative energy.

"Our ultimate goal is to stop this thing and get ratepayers a full refund," said Kerwin Olson, the group's project manager.

Critics also claim that the plant's technology, which converts coal into a synthetic gas, is unproven and not as clean as Duke portrays.

The utility commission is focusing attention on the plant while both Duke and regulators are under intense scrutiny.

The state inspector general's office filed a complaint last month alleging former regulatory commission general counsel Scott Storms broke state ethics law by having a financial interest in the outcome of cases involving Duke while he pursued a job with the company. Storms in July approved Duke's request to have its customers pay for cost overruns on the $2.9 billion plant.

The ethics panel in September cleared Storms to join Duke despite a state law requiring a one-year cooling off period before state employees work for companies they've regulated.

Gov. Mitch Daniels fired regulatory commission Chairman David Lott Hardy for not removing Storms, and Duke suspended Storms and its Indiana president, Mike Reed, pending the completion of its review by outside counsel.

The utility commission said last month it would audit Duke cases Storms was involved in this year and all cases since 2006 on the Edwardsport coal-gasification plant.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT