New art windows on Penn

November 17, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Every once in a while, I'll turn the blog over to reporter Kathleen McLaughlin, who is now covering the arts business beat for IBJ. Welcome her aboard and look for her writing here and in the print edition of IBJ.

Take it away, Kathleen.

Local artist Jodie Hardy offers a different take on the messages transmitted through clothing store mannequins with “Silent Sellers,” which is on display, appropriately, in the windows of the Chase tower parking garage on North Pennsylvania St.

Hardy’s exhibit is part of the "Picture Windows: Urban Interpretations" series, sponsored by the Arts Council of Indianapolis.

So far, the Arts Council has spent roughly $38,000 to commission 32 artists, who all display their work in the windows of downtown office buildings. The series is supported with a grant from the Cultural Development Commission. Insiders might recognize the Cultural Development Commission as the entity set up in 2001 to dole out $12.5 million in grants from the Capital Improvement Board and Lilly Endowment. Close readers will remember that the CDC is waiting on word from the Capital Improvement Board about how much money, if any, will be available in 2009.

Back to the art: Hardy is the first local artist chosen for what amounts to a solo exhibit. The Arts Council paid her $3,000. One part of “Silent Sellers” is a sort of giant shadow box, filled with Barbie dolls clad in yellow “caution” tape. IBJ A&E editor Lou Harry’s two cents: It’s better than the empty plastic bottles. (He’s referring to “Thirst” by a Lance Allen, part of the previous installation by students at Herron School of Art and Design.)

More about the artist She’s a former floral designer from the South Bend area who at age 45 went back to school for a bachelor of fine arts in costume design. She interrupted her education to take a job as the Indiana Repertory Theatre’s costume shop assistant shop manager. She graduated from the Herron School of Art and Design in 2006, and has since been involved in the Zionsville Art Initiative, among other things. This year, Hardy was accepted to Herron’s inaugural class for a master of fine arts in “visual art and civic life.” Her most recent exhibit was "Re-Couture" at the Harrison Center for the Arts.

Your thoughts?
  • What no images? Bummer.
  • Sorry Richard. We're working on it.
  • Welcome, Kathleen! I love the dynamic and structure of this post: interesting guest writer's voice but with two cents from Lou so that I don't have to go without my Lou fix for too long, and nice mixture of answers to my pragmatic, business-of-art questions (is this artist getting paid enough or is she supposed to be working for love and 'exposure'?) plus my emotional, art-as-sustenance questions (what does this art look like? how is it probably going to make me feel when I look at it?)

    I wonder which shows Jodie Hardy worked on for the IRT? They always have such exquisite costumes.

    I love that she went back to school at age 45. And I REALLY love that it is possible to get a master's degree in visual arts and civic life. Maybe over time we will have more politicians with this degree instead of law degrees. Or maybe they will get both, and that will be even better for the community.

    I will be downtown today for a conference. I'll try to find this exhibit in between sessions.

    Kathleen, I hope you blog with Lou again soon. You're both fun to read.

    Hope Baugh
  • Photo now added. Sorry for the delay.
  • Wew, thanks. I thought for a minute I might have to leave home.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

  2. It's good to hear that the festival is continuing to move forward beyond some of the narrow views that seemed to characterize the festival and that I and others had to deal with during our time there.

  3. Corner Bakery announced in March that it had signed agreements to open its first restaurants in Indianapolis by the end of the year. I have not heard anything since but will do some checking.

  4. "The project still is awaiting approval of a waiver filed with the Federal Aviation Administration that would authorize the use of the land for revenue-producing and non-aeronautical purposes." I wonder if the airport will still try to keep from paying taxes on these land tracts, even though they are designated as "non aeronatical?"

  5. How is this frivolous? All they are asking for is medical screenings to test the effects of their exposure. Sounds like the most reasonable lawsuit I've read about in a while. "may not have commited it" which is probably why they're suing to find out the truth. Otherwise they could just ask Walmart, were you negligent? No? OK, thanks for being honest.