New art windows on Penn

November 17, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Every once in a while, I'll turn the blog over to reporter Kathleen McLaughlin, who is now covering the arts business beat for IBJ. Welcome her aboard and look for her writing here and in the print edition of IBJ.

Take it away, Kathleen.

Local artist Jodie Hardy offers a different take on the messages transmitted through clothing store mannequins with “Silent Sellers,” which is on display, appropriately, in the windows of the Chase tower parking garage on North Pennsylvania St.

Hardy’s exhibit is part of the "Picture Windows: Urban Interpretations" series, sponsored by the Arts Council of Indianapolis.

So far, the Arts Council has spent roughly $38,000 to commission 32 artists, who all display their work in the windows of downtown office buildings. The series is supported with a grant from the Cultural Development Commission. Insiders might recognize the Cultural Development Commission as the entity set up in 2001 to dole out $12.5 million in grants from the Capital Improvement Board and Lilly Endowment. Close readers will remember that the CDC is waiting on word from the Capital Improvement Board about how much money, if any, will be available in 2009.

Back to the art: Hardy is the first local artist chosen for what amounts to a solo exhibit. The Arts Council paid her $3,000. One part of “Silent Sellers” is a sort of giant shadow box, filled with Barbie dolls clad in yellow “caution” tape. IBJ A&E editor Lou Harry’s two cents: It’s better than the empty plastic bottles. (He’s referring to “Thirst” by a Lance Allen, part of the previous installation by students at Herron School of Art and Design.)

More about the artist She’s a former floral designer from the South Bend area who at age 45 went back to school for a bachelor of fine arts in costume design. She interrupted her education to take a job as the Indiana Repertory Theatre’s costume shop assistant shop manager. She graduated from the Herron School of Art and Design in 2006, and has since been involved in the Zionsville Art Initiative, among other things. This year, Hardy was accepted to Herron’s inaugural class for a master of fine arts in “visual art and civic life.” Her most recent exhibit was "Re-Couture" at the Harrison Center for the Arts.

Your thoughts?
  • What no images? Bummer.
  • Sorry Richard. We're working on it.
  • Welcome, Kathleen! I love the dynamic and structure of this post: interesting guest writer's voice but with two cents from Lou so that I don't have to go without my Lou fix for too long, and nice mixture of answers to my pragmatic, business-of-art questions (is this artist getting paid enough or is she supposed to be working for love and 'exposure'?) plus my emotional, art-as-sustenance questions (what does this art look like? how is it probably going to make me feel when I look at it?)

    I wonder which shows Jodie Hardy worked on for the IRT? They always have such exquisite costumes.

    I love that she went back to school at age 45. And I REALLY love that it is possible to get a master's degree in visual arts and civic life. Maybe over time we will have more politicians with this degree instead of law degrees. Or maybe they will get both, and that will be even better for the community.

    I will be downtown today for a conference. I'll try to find this exhibit in between sessions.

    Kathleen, I hope you blog with Lou again soon. You're both fun to read.

    Hope Baugh
  • Photo now added. Sorry for the delay.
  • Wew, thanks. I thought for a minute I might have to leave home.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.