New commission could run state museum

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana State Museum could become a quasi-public agency, according to a plan that interim CEO Tom King will promote to the Indiana General Assembly.

King said Monday that Sen. Jim Merritt has agreed to sponsor legislation in the coming session that calls for creating a new commission, similar to those that run White River State Park and the Indiana State Fair. King hopes that, with more streamlined governance, the struggling, state-supported museum will be more successful in raising private donations and keeping CEOs.

The museum has had six different CEOs in the past decade.

"I think it’ll make a huge difference in the way the museum operates," King said. "There’s nobody over here that really is in charge."

King said he plans to stay on the job until the new commission is in place and can begin the search for a new director.

The museum's odd governance structure has been blamed for high turnover in the CEO's post and lackluster fundraising. A private foundation that supports the museum hires the CEO, but the rest of the staff works for the Department of Natural Resources.

The CEO also works with a 13-member board of trustees, which advises the DNR. Gov. Mitch Daniels recruited King, a former president of the Eli Lilly and Co. Foundation, out of semi-retirement to tackle the museum's lingering problems.

King was appointed in January after CEO Barry Dressel abruptly resigned in late 2009. Dressel had been the fifth CEO at the museum since 2000.

Under King's plan, the foundation board and trustees would be replaced with a single 25-member commission. The governor would appoint 13 members, who would appoint the remaining 12. No more than five members could reside in a single county. The commission's officers also would sit on the board of the foundation, which would become a subsidiary corporation.

All museum employees would work for the commission while retaining full state-employee benefits, King said. The new structure also would apply to state historic sites, which the museum operates. 

King already has recruited members to the foundation board with the understanding that they'll be appointed to the new commission, which could be in place by July 1. The recruits so far are Alan Rebar, vice president of research at Purdue University; John Bry, executive director of the Noble County Visitors Bureau; and three people who were involved with the museum's move to White River State park—former Indiana first lady Judy O'Bannon, Susan Williams and Judy Singleton.

State funding for the museum, $5.96 million in the 2009 fiscal year, has fallen 21.5 percent since 2007. King said he hopes the state will keep its support level while the new commission brings in more private donations.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now