IBJNews

New Indiana congressional districts clear Legislature

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Democrats running for Congress will likely have a tougher time under a new district maps that give Republicans the upper hand for seven of the state's nine congressional seats after the GOP held just four going into the last election.

The Indiana House voted 62-31 mostly along party lines Thursday to give final legislative approval to the redistricting plan and send it to Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels, who is expected to sign it.

The plan shifts several Republican-leaning areas into northern Indiana's 2nd District, narrowly won last year by Democrat Joe Donnelly. It also appears to strengthen the GOP's hold on southern Indiana's 9th District — captured in 2010 by Republican Todd Young — by extending it further north to include heavily GOP Johnson County just south of Indianapolis.

Republicans defend the new districts as being more compact and keeping more counties together than the redistricting plan implemented in 2001 by Democrats, who then controlled the once-a-decade redistricting based on census figures.

Mike McDaniel, a former state Republican chairman, said the state's typical political leanings give the GOP an advantage.

"That's what you get when you draw these maps in a compact geographic way," McDaniel said. "The only way it was not that way was that Democrats went out of their way to gerrymander a lot of districts last time around."

Democrats argue the redistricting plan is aimed at protecting the state's six Republican congressmen and helping the GOP win Donnelly's seat. But they see an opening in that many of those GOP congressmen have had their district boundaries change significantly.

"The problem with the way they've tinkered with the maps is that some incumbents now have to go and introduce themselves into large swaths of their districts," state Democratic Chairman Dan Parker said.

Democrats hit a high-water mark by holding five of the state's nine congressional seats after the 2006 and 2008 elections. But Young and Larry Bucshon won back two of those seats for Republicans last year, and GOP candidate Jackie Walorski has already announced another bid for the seat she narrowly lost to Donnelly.

Donnelly is considering a run for the U.S. Senate seat now held by Republican Richard Lugar.

Features of the redistricting plan include:

— maintaining solid Republican leanings for three long-time GOP seats now held by Marlin Stutzman (3rd District); Todd Rokita (4th District); and Dan Burton (5th District).

— keeping two strongly Democratic districts now held by Pete Visclosky (1st District) and Andre Carson (7th District).

— strengthening for Republicans the 2nd District, now held by Donnelly, by giving it all of Elkhart County and much of Kosciusko County, moving part of Democratic-leaning LaPorte County to the 1st District and removing all of Kokomo.

— shifting the 6th District held by Republican Mike Pence to the south, with it stretching from the Muncie area to four counties along the Ohio River. The GOP-leaning district could be an open seat next year if Pence makes his anticipated run to replace the term-limited Daniels as governor.

— leaving southwestern Indiana's 8th District, which Bucshon won in 2010, as a potential swing district as it picks up some Democratic-leaning counties along the Ohio River east of Evansville.

— turning the 9th District from what has long been a swing district made up of mostly rural southeastern Indiana counties into one that goes from the Louisville, Ky., suburbs to the fast-growing southern suburbs of Indianapolis. Those changes appear to strengthen it for the GOP's Young.

Parker maintained that Republicans didn't follow their rhetoric of drawing districts that made geographic sense.

"Look at the communities of interest they tried to tie together — Indianapolis suburbs with Louisville suburbs, three districts that touch the Ohio River," Parker said. "The whole notion that they were going to keep parts of the state together that needed to be together — that's a farce."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Seriously?
    Really? I'm in Carson's district and he has NEVER visited our area or had any concern for the people who were not poor or inner city. I have written to him several times about concerns and his office responds with either sarcasm or responds to an unrelated issue. And now, in August, he has said people who are conservative want to bring back Jim Crow laws and lynch black people. SERIOUSLY?! How dare he!
  • SCREWED?
    Are you kidding? Much of Marion County has been in DAN BURTON's district for years because you Republicans can't seem to get rid of him. A Congressman like Andre Carson will be a welcome relief. He actually gives a you-know-what about people in his district!
    • SCREWED?
      Are you kidding? Much of Marion County has been in DAN BURTON's district for years because you Republicans can't seem to get rid of him. A Congressman like Andre Carson will be a welcome relief. He actually gives a you-know-what about people in his district!
    • We still got screwed
      For the folks in the indianapolis area we still got screwed. While the northing part of marion county is in a new district the rest of the city still had to deal with carson as their congresspreson.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. liek the rest of America

      2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

      3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

      4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

      5. whoa!

      ADVERTISEMENT