IBJNews

New Indiana congressional districts clear Legislature

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Democrats running for Congress will likely have a tougher time under a new district maps that give Republicans the upper hand for seven of the state's nine congressional seats after the GOP held just four going into the last election.

The Indiana House voted 62-31 mostly along party lines Thursday to give final legislative approval to the redistricting plan and send it to Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels, who is expected to sign it.

The plan shifts several Republican-leaning areas into northern Indiana's 2nd District, narrowly won last year by Democrat Joe Donnelly. It also appears to strengthen the GOP's hold on southern Indiana's 9th District — captured in 2010 by Republican Todd Young — by extending it further north to include heavily GOP Johnson County just south of Indianapolis.

Republicans defend the new districts as being more compact and keeping more counties together than the redistricting plan implemented in 2001 by Democrats, who then controlled the once-a-decade redistricting based on census figures.

Mike McDaniel, a former state Republican chairman, said the state's typical political leanings give the GOP an advantage.

"That's what you get when you draw these maps in a compact geographic way," McDaniel said. "The only way it was not that way was that Democrats went out of their way to gerrymander a lot of districts last time around."

Democrats argue the redistricting plan is aimed at protecting the state's six Republican congressmen and helping the GOP win Donnelly's seat. But they see an opening in that many of those GOP congressmen have had their district boundaries change significantly.

"The problem with the way they've tinkered with the maps is that some incumbents now have to go and introduce themselves into large swaths of their districts," state Democratic Chairman Dan Parker said.

Democrats hit a high-water mark by holding five of the state's nine congressional seats after the 2006 and 2008 elections. But Young and Larry Bucshon won back two of those seats for Republicans last year, and GOP candidate Jackie Walorski has already announced another bid for the seat she narrowly lost to Donnelly.

Donnelly is considering a run for the U.S. Senate seat now held by Republican Richard Lugar.

Features of the redistricting plan include:

— maintaining solid Republican leanings for three long-time GOP seats now held by Marlin Stutzman (3rd District); Todd Rokita (4th District); and Dan Burton (5th District).

— keeping two strongly Democratic districts now held by Pete Visclosky (1st District) and Andre Carson (7th District).

— strengthening for Republicans the 2nd District, now held by Donnelly, by giving it all of Elkhart County and much of Kosciusko County, moving part of Democratic-leaning LaPorte County to the 1st District and removing all of Kokomo.

— shifting the 6th District held by Republican Mike Pence to the south, with it stretching from the Muncie area to four counties along the Ohio River. The GOP-leaning district could be an open seat next year if Pence makes his anticipated run to replace the term-limited Daniels as governor.

— leaving southwestern Indiana's 8th District, which Bucshon won in 2010, as a potential swing district as it picks up some Democratic-leaning counties along the Ohio River east of Evansville.

— turning the 9th District from what has long been a swing district made up of mostly rural southeastern Indiana counties into one that goes from the Louisville, Ky., suburbs to the fast-growing southern suburbs of Indianapolis. Those changes appear to strengthen it for the GOP's Young.

Parker maintained that Republicans didn't follow their rhetoric of drawing districts that made geographic sense.

"Look at the communities of interest they tried to tie together — Indianapolis suburbs with Louisville suburbs, three districts that touch the Ohio River," Parker said. "The whole notion that they were going to keep parts of the state together that needed to be together — that's a farce."


ADVERTISEMENT
  • Seriously?
    Really? I'm in Carson's district and he has NEVER visited our area or had any concern for the people who were not poor or inner city. I have written to him several times about concerns and his office responds with either sarcasm or responds to an unrelated issue. And now, in August, he has said people who are conservative want to bring back Jim Crow laws and lynch black people. SERIOUSLY?! How dare he!
  • SCREWED?
    Are you kidding? Much of Marion County has been in DAN BURTON's district for years because you Republicans can't seem to get rid of him. A Congressman like Andre Carson will be a welcome relief. He actually gives a you-know-what about people in his district!
    • SCREWED?
      Are you kidding? Much of Marion County has been in DAN BURTON's district for years because you Republicans can't seem to get rid of him. A Congressman like Andre Carson will be a welcome relief. He actually gives a you-know-what about people in his district!
    • We still got screwed
      For the folks in the indianapolis area we still got screwed. While the northing part of marion county is in a new district the rest of the city still had to deal with carson as their congresspreson.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. something to take iman's mind off CART,,,the league itsownself doesn't do it

      2. Someone mentioned a green roof. Every designer of a new urban building should be required to at least explore the feasibility of a green roof. The ability to cut carbon dioxide, save precious rainwater (drought this summer??) and re-use grey water, cool the building cheaper, and improve the view for neighbors, should be, not only the good neighbor thing to do, it should be the responsible neighbor thing to do. Too bad the city didn't require it when they gave up downtown green space for the Simon Building. Surprised they aren't requiring it now.

      3. About the same means down, like the TV ratings.

        My favorite tradition that needs to be brought back is the 25/8 rule.

      4. Your stats are incorrect. The 85k Government employees working in Marion County includes all government workers in Marion county. That is state, federal, non profit agencies, city and county. The stats the article list is the number of employees for all of the city/county employees and it is correct. That number includes the library, airport, convention center, and so on. The policy of extending benefits to domestic partners is consistent with private sector companies of the same size. Isn't the mantra of most conservatives "run the government like a business."

        Also, too say the "fiscal proposil is huge" without considering the actuarial factors involved is a bit of an overstatement. We really don't know if it is huge or not. If all of the people added to the plan are healthy and don't have claims then it could bring cost done or hold them neutral.

      5. There are 85,346 government employees in Marion county according to Stats Indiana.

        My understanding is that this proposal covers not only same sex partners and children, but opposite same sex partners who are not married and any kids.

        It also covers all city and county employees, plus municipal corporations which use city/county benefits packages including Health and Hospital Corporation (Wishard), Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis Convention Center,Lucas Oil,Bankers Life, Indianapolis Marion County Library, and Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation (IndyGo).

        Certainly Indianapolis Public Schools will also want more benefits also.

        The fiscal cost on this proposal is huge.

      ADVERTISEMENT