New rendering: Zing

August 15, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Here's the overall vision for the new Zing restaurant at 543 Indiana Ave. By the way, I'm told the galvanized steel has to cure for one year before they paint it black. The restaurant should open in a couple weeks. Last week's post is here.
Zing Indianapolis
ADVERTISEMENT
  • assuming it is painted black, I think it looks great
  • Nice rendering. It takes a few liberties with the building -- too few ground floor windows and third floor dormers -- but I'm glad to hear that the steel will be painted black. I really wish the dormers they added matched the existing one on the point as well the imagined ones here do.

    http://tinyurl.com/6asrhu
  • That will help immensely.

    Do they plan on adding the flared bases to the support beams? That would also help.

    Any word on the menu? Has that been mentioned already?
  • Susan Guyett had a small piece in the Star last week. Key menu quotes:

    Small-plate
    menu spanning American, French, Mexican, Portuguese and Italian cuisine
    $7-11
    50 wines to choose from and about 25 beers

    http://tinyurl.com/623dq4
  • This rendering doesn't reference the surrounding area at all. Sure, it looks fine all by itself. But in reality, I don't think painting the attrocious steel balcony black is going to make it look any better.
    I'm still very skeptical...
  • I love it! I can't wait for it to open
  • Yeah, the black will be a big improvement.
  • I find it interesting that the artist chose to construct the viewpoint at such an oddly high altitude. The viewer seems to be about 12-feet tall. It leads me to believe that he/she was directed to draw it in such a way as to minimize the visibility of the deck (not an uncommon trait of developers). Normal-sized pedestrians and drivers will see much more of its underside. Don't get me started on the jungle in the background that has overgrown the surrounding buildings.

    I think the problem most people have with the deck is at the point, where the 2nd floor space seems to be disproportionately large against the building. Runner up would be the concealment of the ornate architectural detailing over the 1st floor door.

    Just to clarify something else - regarding the galvanized vs. paint dilemma, out of maybe a half a dozen options, this team CHOSE to use galvanized steel for this application. This was a valid choice structurally, but it is not fair to imply that it was the only choice and therefore the deck HAS to look like this (for a year).
  • MDB -- two of your points actually go together: the height of the balcony and the concealment of the ornate detailing. The balcony is as tall as it is precisely so that it does NOT conceal the ornate detailing:

    http://tinyurl.com/5cf3mt
  • Loves it! xoxo
  • You can't paint galvanized steel for a year? BOLLOCKS! I've never heard such BOGUS information. Give Sherwin Williams a call and I'm sure they'll get you up to speed on that. Did someone do interWEB research on that fact or what? Is there an April Fools Day in August?
  • Are the new dormers going to be given proper masonry work shown in this rendering?
    Are they really going to add that cast-iron metal work to the railings and posts? I hope so, it would add so much charm and architecture to an already beautiful building!
    This structure is quiet unique and beautiful for that portion of downtown. The renovations should if anything add to the beauty to the landmark.
    I was actually turned off by this development as I was to a large degree concerned that it may destroy the charm of this structure. I can see now, it may be quiet beautiful if it is kept with the rendering.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT