IBJNews

New section of Interstate 69 getting positive reviews

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With the opening of  Interstate 69 in Greene County comes a new daily stop for truck driver Ed Miller.

Five days a week, he pulls his 2011 Volvo semi into the parking lot at the CountryMark service station on Ind. 231, near the northernmost interstate exchange, to rest up.

Monday morning, he stretched his legs and bought a pack of Winstons, a sausage-egg biscuit and two packages of Little Debbie chocolate-frosted mini doughnuts.

His day begins at 2 a.m. when he leaves Clayton, Ohio, with a load of Caterpillar heavy equipment parts destined for a distribution plant in the southern Indiana town of Washington.

It's 216 miles each way, and he is spending 30 miles or so on the new stretch of I-69 that opened two weeks ago that stops dead there at the 231 interchange. Miller guesses he is saving 30 minutes each way.

David Salmon of Loogootee hauls coal and crushed stone in his 2000 International semi. Monday morning, he has a 25-ton load of coal bound for Indianapolis from the Peabody coal mine not far from the U.S. 231 interchange. Coming back, he will load up with crushed stone in Spencer and haul it to Petersburg before his day is over.

He is saving a lot of time driving on the newest segment of I-69, and the cost of diesel fuel as well. "'By the end of the week, I'll have saved about $200 in fuel costs. I was spending about $1,400," he told The Herald-Times.

The construction of the 67-mile segment kept Salmon working during an economic downturn that hurt a lot of people in his business. "I hauled a lot of rock for that road, sometimes eight loads a day at 25 tons a load," the 32-year-old independent contractor said. "That highway kept me busy. If not for this interstate, I probably would have gone under in this economy."

But he worries about the small towns the highway bypasses. "Places like Bloomfield and Loogootee, they are going to suffer for this road," he said. "All the traffic and people, they are just going to pass small towns by."

Tracey Englert lives in Zionsville and travels throughout Indiana and Kentucky as a regional manager for Walgreens. She drove from Evansville to Indianapolis the day the new section of I-69 opened and was ecstatic when she cut nearly an hour off the trip. "I love the highway," she said, stopping for gas to fill her Nissan Rogue SUV and a trip to the ladies' room at the CountryMark station. "I thought it might shave 20 minutes off the drive, but it was so much more. I've been telling everyone."

She does not miss driving through the small towns that once slowed her travels. And she thinks the highway is safer to drive on.

Brian Trudt hopes people like the highway. He's spent two years helping build it, and is set to move on to another highway project in Illinois now that the I-69 project in Greene County is wrapped up. "It's shortened my commute to St. Louis by 40 minutes," he said.

Gene Hamilton was filling gas cans for mowing on a December day when the temperature was more like September. "I think it'll be just fine," the 76-year-old farmer said of I-69. "It'll be good for the truckers. These country roads have a lot of curves."

CountryMark manager Tammy Vest has worked at the small-town service station 13 years. She said about everyone who comes in has good things to say about the new highway. She lives nearby, and stays mostly on the local roads but appreciates the ability to get places faster on I-69.

But she is hearing rumors that a mega gas station might be heading her way; she hopes they are not true. "If they get a Flying J, then maybe a Cracker Barrel or something, no one will be coming in here for biscuit sandwiches," she said.

Vest hasn't noticed business picking up too much since the highway opened, but said there are definitely more people stopping in for lunch. "I had one couple who thought I-69 would get them to Anderson," she said. "I had to set them straight."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Small minds
    It's a shame that people like Joe only view as progress what they deem to be progress. Interstates certainly have their downsides (the loss of land and impact on the area should always be considered) but denying the economic and quality of life opportunities created by improved transportation to those affected by this new highway is unfair. The benefits definitely outweigh the negatives. By the way, Joe, commerce is not evil. What is closer to evil are those people who think they are smarter than everyone else and that the poor lunks who might disagree with you aren't capable of understanding and determining what’s in their best interests.
  • THANK YOU!!!
    I just want to THANK those of you who wanted this road built!! This will definitely trim my trips to Bloomington down by mileage and time and gas! Thank You Indiana for doing this~!
  • Poor Choice
    That's cute, this disgrace of a project lets people hauling fading products travel faster, provided temporary construction jobs which are now gone and is a boon for struggeling gas stations. This is all very very positive news. Thanks Mitch!
    • still viable
      The small roads are still viable and now won't get torn up as much with out as many trucks. The small towns need to go together maybe per county to their regional development people and market their area as a leisurely drive and destination on the weekends.Market what you have

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT