Lumina chair Mutz preps for a W downturn

August 31, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A growing number of indicators, both official and anecdotal, suggest the recession that began in late 2007 is over. Industrial production is up, consumer confidence is rising, and so on.

All well and good. But the chairman of Lumina Foundation, the Indianapolis group that focuses on improving college education levels, is digging in for another downturn before things improve for the long haul.

John Mutz, who remains active in a number of roles including a board seat on the Indiana Economic Development Corp., says Lumina Foundation in the past couple of months has shifted part of its investment portfolio to cash, corporate bonds and other safe harbors despite recent improvement in the stock market.

And the former lieutenant governor has enough confidence in the strategy to follow suit with his personal investments.

Why? Because the U.S. still faces two major headwinds, he says.

Consumers, who drive the lion’s share of the economy, won’t be spending much for a long time. The home equity that fueled much of the pre-recession bubble is gone, so consumers wouldn’t be able to go on another spending binge by borrowing against their homes if they wanted to. Consumers also have learned a painful lesson about spending beyond their means. “Frugality is going to be with us for a while,” he says.

The second headwind is education levels. One of the most under-reported stories is that the U.S. is falling behind other industrialized countries in college attainment, Mutz cautions. He warns the erosion of the country’s competitive position doesn’t bode well for a lasting economic recovery.

Add it up, and the U.S. economy probably won’t emerge in reasonably strong condition for another three years, Mutz says.

A sobering assessment, to be sure. What do you think about it?
 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT