New denomination headquartered in Indy?

September 24, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Might a new church denomination form after members of a conservative Lutheran group meet in Fishers on Friday and Saturday, and might that denomination be headquartered here—far from the unofficial center of the Lutheran world, Minneapolis?

Possibly.

At least 1,200 disaffected members of the Chicago-based Evangelical Lutheran Church in America plan to discuss a 559-451 vote at a national denominational assembly to end a ban on gay clergy. The August convention was in Minneapolis. The Fishers meeting, which has been planned for months, was moved to the larger Holy Spirit Catholic Church from Christ the Savior Lutheran Church to accommodate an avalanche of registrations.

A member of the steering committee for the conservative group, Ryan Schwarz, says the group met in Indianapolis a year ago, and chose the city again for this week’s meeting for reasons cited by lots of other not-for-profits that make Indianapolis home: its central location and ease of traveling in and out.

Schwarz wouldn’t speculate whether a new denomination would form or, if so, where it would be headquartered. He emphasized the meeting hasn’t been called to create a new denomination, but rather to launch a year of study and “discernment” about a how to “bring about a reconfiguration of Lutheranism in North America.”

But, he says his group, the Coalition for Reform, or CORE, likes Indianapolis a lot. “I just know we’ll be back to Indianapolis for meetings, because it’s such a great place to be,” said Schwarz, a layman who lives in Washington, D.C. “I would be shocked if this is the last time we are in Indianapolis.”

The Evangelical Lutherans are nowhere near the size of the largest U.S. church denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention, but with 4.6 million members and 10,396 congregations, it isn’t small, either.

Schwarz noted that a denominational survey taken in 2004 showed 57 percent of respondents opposed changing the traditional teaching on homosexuality. So, he suggested, it wouldn’t be surprising if a number of congregations leave the denomination.

Anybody disagree with his observations about Indianapolis? On a separate note, how do you feel about the gay clergy question that’s also rippling through United Methodist, Episcopal and other denominations?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • dissapproving citizenSeptember 24, 2009 12:46 PM
    I believe it is always a positive thing for people to grow in acceptance of those different from themselves. I believe we all have the right to our own beliefs and religious freedoms. However I fail to see why people have any problems with homosexuality and people who are born gay? Sins are things that are inately bad because they bring harm to others or ones self. Being born gay and having a loving relationship is no different than being heterosexual in a loving relationship. With all the problems and hateful behavior in this world, it is beyond me why anyone would devote energy towards ensuring unequal rights for anyone. Sometimes change is good. If someone is gay and wants to devote their life to God how can that be a bad thing? What does ones personal attraction have to do with any other part of their life? There are so few people interested in being clergy these days. We should be supporting those who have the moral fortitude to devote their lives to their belief in God.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
    • Steve TuchmanSeptember 24, 2009 2:02 PM
      I'm all for economic development but the last thing Indy needs is the by-product of an other-world schism, and the un-enlightened end of it, to boot. Please, go elsewhere.
      Reply to CommentFlag Comment
      • BerwickGuySeptember 24, 2009 4:54 PM
        Steve,

        So, if one follows (or attempts to) God's laws, that makes him "unenlightened"? Me thinks not.
        Reply to CommentFlag Comment
      • BerwickGuySeptember 24, 2009 5:01 PM
        First of all, if one truly believes in diversity, that should include opinions different than your own. That should make this group welcome in Indy.

        Secondly, while no one is going to win the disagreement of whether people are "born gay", that is somewhat beside the point. I agree that people have the right to make their own way in this world, and if that includes a same sex relationship, so be it. However, why is disagreeing with that viewpoint wrong?

        Let's not forget the architect of the bible and the earth, God, said something entirely different. Those that follow God's word should not be criticized because of their beliefs anymore than the ones that espouse same sex relationships. If we are going to get along, we have to learn to accept diverse opinions. We shouldn't be so small minded that we don't want them here because we don't agree with them!
        Reply to CommentFlag Comment
      • IndymanSeptember 28, 2009 11:20 AM
        I believe that all men and woman are created equal, but I also believe that only men should be Priests. Is that discriminatory?

        Back on topic, our location is the best thing going for us. It and value are the main reasons we are a top convention city.
        Reply to CommentFlag Comment
        • lisaSeptember 28, 2009 12:39 PM
          To answer your question Indyman: Yep.

          Have a great day.
          Reply to CommentFlag Comment

        Post a comment to this blog

        COMMENTS POLICY
        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
         
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
         
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
         
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
         
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
         

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        ADVANCED SEARCH
        Sponsored by
        ADVERTISEMENT

        1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

        2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

        3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

        4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

        5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

        ADVERTISEMENT