Afraid to die

October 19, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Dr. Mercy Obeime, a doctor and the medical director of St. Francis Neighborhood Health Center at Garfield Park, made an interesting observation during a recent IBJ Power Breakfast on health care.

Obeime, who was on a panel of health care experts at the breakfast, noted how people have come to expect life-sustaining miracles even when a patient is old and near death. Often, she said, relatives insist, “Well, we’re not ready for this …  they can’t die, they can’t die.”

Those miracles are expensive, of course, and her comments came as the panel discussed how to avoid building too much capacity into the health care system. You can find her remarks and the thoughts of others on the panel here.

Death is a part of life. Does fear of death cause Americans to expect too much from our medical system when it comes to prolonging the lives of the old and infirm?
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Life becomes more precious the older we get
    Just a thought...

    If people are going to consider spending tens of thousands of dollars on risky treatment that might allow them to live a few more months or years at the most, maybe they should start thinking more about where they are going to spend their eternity. Isn't that what we should really do to treat our loved ones well? Why cling to the illusion that another operation will add a few more years?

    After all, last time I checked, mankind never discovered the secret of immortality.
    • Freedom to Choose
      Fear of death is a natural part of life as well. Many people may indeed expect impossible feats from today's medicine, but what is standard life saving practice today, would have been considered a "miracle" just 5 or 6 years ago. It is pretty audacious to start to think of making life or death medical choices for others. When your mother is sick or injured... or your child....and the new government imposed health plan determines that the chances of them having the "quality of life" that THEY determine as standard, is unlikely.... then what? The doctor writes a script for pain killers to make people "comfortable" as they pass? Do we really want others determining whether we choose to not give up on our ailing family members? For at least right now, this still is a supposedly FREE country for which we each have the right to make decisions for ourselves. Now there may be times when there truly is nothing more that can be done, but what choices are made at that point are up to the family ...not an insurance company or especially our government. Something we all should consider before it is too late to be changed...
      • Freedom to choose
        In response to "disapproving citizen," yes, the choice to continue care for an ailing person does belong to the relatives; however, the cost to society (as well as the personal cost to the family) should also be part of that choice, and the family needs to be realistic. Should someone (be it the family, an insurance company, etc.) spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on a "miracle" that will add less than a year of life to a severely ill elderly person, simply because the family isn't ready to let Grandpa go? What about Grandpa's wishes? I'm 100% against insurance companies making the decision for purely profit reasons, but we all have a duty to think about the sustainability of the overall health care system when considering our options.

      Post a comment to this blog

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

      2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

      3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

      4. Send them back NOW.

      5. deport now

      ADVERTISEMENT