Cutting corners on the I-69 extension

October 23, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Gov. Mitch Daniels is raising eyebrows in the Evansville area for ramrodding a section of the Interstate 69 extension ahead of schedule by a whopping three years.

The 68-mile stretch from Evansville to the Naval Surface Warfare Center at Crane now is expected to be built by 2012. In other words, nearly half the distance to Indianapolis would be completed by Daniels’ final year in office.

The push is so preliminary that the Department of Transportation hasn’t started the drawings for parts of the Evansville-to-Crane leg, let alone acquired the land or permits. Still, the department’s deputy commissioner for major programs, Samuel Sarvis, told Evansville Courier & Press editors this month that the target can be met.

And the project will be done in typical Daniels fashion, the lowest cost possible. That means using the same firm to design and build the road, which will allow construction to begin when the designs aren’t so much as half-complete.

Pavement will be thin at first because planners anticipate few trucks until the entire road is finished to Indianapolis. More pavement can be added later. The decision between concrete and asphalt also will be heavily influenced by cost.

How do you feel about the plans? Many people in southwestern reaches of the state are grateful the long-discussed project is finally moving ahead. But will future taxpayers wish the state spent more money up front?

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Build it and they will come
    I think that Daniels wants to get the ball rolling. I can't blame him for that. If it doesn't get built, we will regret that in 20 years.
  • I think anything that gets the road built is good. Pavement thickness is not as big an issue now as getting it built. Adding asphalt in the top when needed will not be a big issue, and hopefully it will shut up the naysayers or at least make their arguements moot.
    • paper thin
      If you're going to build it, you have to build it right. So what's the state going to do? Are they going to have the ribbon cutting and immediately send out the construction workers to fix this thing? This makes zero sense.

      If they're really trying to save money just make I69 gravel..they can always go back and lay concrete.
    • major moves indeed
      They've been talking about I-69 in Evansville for 20 years becasue of studies and environmental delays. We have a Governor who wants to get this done, the next Gov. may not. It is much easier for foes to dealy the project again if it is not started than to stop it midway through.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now

    ADVERTISEMENT