Wal-Mart gets into the casket business

November 6, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Wal-Mart is a lot like the computer: Wherever it goes, entrenched business models are turned upside down.

So, Hillenbrand Inc., which owns the world’s largest casket maker, Batesville Casket Co., is watching Wal-Mart closely as it enters the business Batesville Casket has navigated for a century in its namesake southeastern Indiana community.

Wal-Mart quietly began offering caskets on its Web site late last month. Buy a casket, and Wal-Mart will FedEx it straight to the funeral home.

Retail sales of caskets isn’t new. Sears peddled them in the dark ages, and Costco put them in stores a few years ago only to pull back after customers complained. Nevertheless, Costco isn’t Wal-Mart, so the upshot of its online venture remains to be seen.

It won’t be easy for Wal-Mart to dramatically undercut funeral directors. Mortuaries used to charge $6,000 or so for a casket, but the cost covered all the services. Now caskets and various services are priced individually, so directors have cut casket prices and compensated by increasing prices for services.

Wal-Mart models start at $895 and range to the $2,899 Sienna Bronze Casket. However, add shipping, and the prices aren’t much different than what funeral homes charge.

Wal-Mart, by the way, isn’t buying its caskets from Batesville, but from an Illinois startup, Star Legacy Funeral Network.

Hillenbrand spokeswoman Teresa Gyulafia says she doesn’t know if Wal-Mart approached Batesville about making its caskets. And she won’t discuss prices it charges funeral directors.

However, while acknowledging Batesville is keeping an eye on Wal-Mart, Gyulafia says it isn’t a threat because the companies operate so differently. Batesville lavishes funeral directors with custom touches from embroidered lids and hobby-themed corners to ensuring the casket is unpacked and dusted off with “white-glove service.”

“We have a completely different business model,” Gyulafia says. “A casket is not a box. A casket is not a commodity.”

Stock in Hillenbrand, which churns out $600 million a year in sales, has slipped a couple of dollars since the Wal-Mart news got out but is still above $19 a share.

How would you react if you were a Hillenbrand executive? And how do you feel about buying caskets online?


  • Only time will tell
    Funerals, for most part, are intimate and very personal for family and friends. Shopping online for a casket for your loved one doesn't seem very personal. Personally, I would not buy a casket without seeing it first.

    I don't think Hillenbrand should be worried...unless Walmart figures out a way to reduce shipping charges and the overall cost to the consumer.
  • how much?
    At first, I thought the idea was a joke (when I first heard), but to hear it over and over again, it sounds like a legit idea. My question is, how much of a demand did they have before they considered actually providing it online. I would love to see the responses that walmart got to consider the idea.
  • Cashing in
    Walmart is establishing themselves in the market while the baby boomers are growing older by the day. The investment "may" pay off for them, but who knows. It's a good idea, but I just don't know if the demand is going to be there. I don't think anyone is going to think about shopping online when it comes to purchasing a casket and how convenient it is. Just my thought.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.