Layoff euphemisms

November 9, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Border’s announcement today that it will close 200 Waldenbooks locations, including the one in Greenwood Park Mall, amounted to yet another layoff notice as the economy continues to sputter.

Approximately 1,500 positions, mostly part-time, will be affected by the “right-sizing,” Borders warned.

Borders actually used the “L” word, “layoff,” in the release, so it was more honest than some. At least “smartsized,” “streamlined,” “offboarded” and some of the other euphemisms were absent.

Why do so many corporations beat around the bush? Butler University professor Ed Kanis thinks corporations are inherently uncomfortable with direct language.

Kanis, who headed communications for Louisville-based Kindred Healthcare as it went through Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization several years ago, says human resources departments in particular are euphemism factories.

“You’re always trying to deliver messages in the most sensitive way possible,” he says. But, “Professionals get it. It’s somewhat of a cop-out not to be direct.”

Euphemisms aren’t going away, Kanis says. If for no other reason, “Spanglish” words understood to both English and Spanish speakers will emerge. “Every year the wordsmiths among us come up with new language.”

How do you feel about layoff euphemisms? Any favorites?

  • For me, "The company was going in a different direction", whatever that means. Does not matter, I got a much better job while my former employer is now using the "L" word as they eliminate more of my former coworkers.

    They really need to ditch the warm and fuzzy feel good words and be blunt about it. You were either laid off or fired. Not all of these euphemisms that do not fool anyone.
  • Sensitivity?
    I wasn't "laid off". My "position was eliminated".
  • Excuse
    "In an effort for the company to achieve profitability this quarter, we had to X, Y, and Z."
  • Thinking Outside of the Box
    This was the explanation that I received: Our company was contemplating a way to maximize profibility in the 3rd quarter. In order to strike while the iron is hot, we had to think outside the box and come up with fresh ideas and therefore we are going a different direction with your position.
  • Never say "you're fired"
    My old company used to say, "we are encouraging you to be successful elsewhere". Love it.
  • Sensitivity? p2
    I was in the same situation as Cathy to a tee, but found out 6 months later, they are rehiring for the same position in which I was let go for. Lets face it, It was a short term Layoff for the position in which later could bring the position back without bringing the employee back. End Result, I went back to school and getting a cert and now at a job which pays much better than what they would have offered if they would come back and rehire me.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1