Don't confuse Toyota for GM

November 25, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

It’s easy in times like these to ask if Toyota has peaked, to compare the Japanese automaker’s status to General Motor’s dominance in the U.S. in the ’50 and ‘60s and its subsequent decline.

But that would be a mistake, says Bruce Belzowski, an auto analyst at the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute.

Unlike GM in its glory days, Toyota is fighting several strong competitors in a global economy, Belzowski reminds. Thus Toyota can’t afford to grow complacent and take its eye off the ball.

Toyota is back in the news again this week with another embarrassing recall. This time it’s over faulty gas pedals. Just weeks ago, the federal government began investigating complaints of rust in frames of its Tundra pickup trucks.

Toyota, which supports thousands of automotive jobs through its assembly plant in the southwestern Indiana town of Princeton, is dealing with two overarching problems. One is sluggish sales caused by the global economic downturn. The other is a string of once-uncharacteristic recalls, the result of its quick expansion over the past decade into a global powerhouse.

The sales downturn will go away as the economy recovers, Belzowski predicts. And Toyota is bearing down on the quality problems by asking fundamental questions about its internal processes.

Belzowski believes global competition has become so intense that in a given five-year period, Toyota or any one of a handful of other companies could rise to dominance. In other words, the future can still belong to Toyota.

What do you think? Has Toyota peaked, or will it rise to a long period of dominance? Have the recalls given you pause about buying its vehicles?

 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • peaked
    GM and others will match and could pass them. Americans are overall smarter than Japaneese who never invent anything but copy Ameican products and try to make them bette.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT